About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Finance Intangible Assets Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

Trinidad and Tobago

TT007-j

Back

H.C.A. No. 499 of 1993

This case concerns a dispute concerning the quantum of license fees payable to the respondent.

The applicants filed a notice seeking a declaration that they should (a) be granted a general license to record certain copyrighted musical works and performances and to make reproductions, records and copies for sale, (b) be granted a declaration that the terms and conditions that the responded seeks to grant the applicants general licenses as defined by section 54 of the Copyright Act 1985 are unreasonable and (c) that the court should determine the terms and conditions upon which the license should be granted to the applicants.

The second applicant, Prime Radio, had been operating for 16 months without a license or without making payment of fees to the respondent. Upon the applicant making two separate payments equally of TTD$50,000, an interim license was granted by the respondent. There was still however an outstanding balance which the applicants admitted to owing. The applicants expressed concern over the formula the respondent used to arrive at the fee; it was their submission that the fee should be negotiated between the parties. According to the applicant, not all of the revenue generated was from music, but also from programs where there was no musical input.

When the National Carnival Commission (NCC) sold its broadcasting rights to the 1993 carnival to Prime Radio, the respondent argued that in order for the contract to be exercised, Prime Radio needed its authorization to use its repertoire of music. The respondent also noted that Prime Radio required their permission to make audio tapes for commercial purposes within the four-month period of the release of the latest piece of music on the said tape (see s. 36(2) of the Copyright Act 1985). The respondent wanted the applicant to sign backdated agreements for broadcasting licenses and to pay all outstanding license fees according to their stipulated formula. Two notifications were also sent to applicant to desist from making use of copyrighted music on its airways.

The court’s approach was to consider the standards businesspersons would hold for themselves to determine what was reasonable. In doing so, the court dismissed the Originating Motion on the grounds of insufficient evidence. The court conclusively held that the application failed and that the Originating Motion was to be dismissed.