About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working at WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets Future of IP WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Youth Examiners Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Finance Intangible Assets Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism Music PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Staff Positions Non-staff Positions Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

Japan

JP061-j

1996(Gyo-Tsu)185

Machine translation
close
tranlsation detector

Date of Judgment: 18.02.2000

 

Issuing Authority: Supreme Court

 

Level of the Issuing Authority: Final Instance

 

Type of Procedure: Judicial (Administrative)

 

Subject Matter: Other

 

Main text of the judgment (decision):

1. The jokoku appeal shall be dismissed.

2. The jokoku appellant shall cover the costs of the jokoku appeal

 

Reasons:

Concerning the First ground for the jokoku appeal by the jokoku appellant attorneys, ISHII Seiichi, SAKURAI Syuhei, YAMADA Toshiaki, KOSHIBA Fumio, ISAKA Mitsuaki, and CHIBA Taichi:

According to the record, the jokoku appellee and two other companies (third parties in this case) brought action to revoke the patent owned by the jokoku appellants, and the trial court decided that such a request cannot be made. Only the jokoku appellee claims to revoke the trial decision.In this situation, the claim to revoke the trial decision is correct because there is no reason to require all parties who brought the original trial action to appeal. Therefore, the argument made by the jokoku appellant cannot be considered.

 

Concerning the Second ground for the jokoku appeal:

The decision made by the original court regarding the point argued by the jokoku appellant in this jokoku appeal should be correct considering the evidence raised in the original court. There was no error in the procedure. The argument made by the jokoku appellant either criticizes the admission of evidence and the recognition of the facts, which is the special privilege of the original court, or argues that the decision by the original court is based on the Jokoku Appelants own views. Such an argument cannot be considered.

Accordingly, we unanimously decided as the main text of the judgment.

(This translation is provisional and subject to revision.)

The copyright for this English material was assigned to the Supreme Court of Japan by Institute of Intellectual Property.