About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Finance Intangible Assets Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction WIPO-Administered Treaties Back

UPOV Notification No. 50
International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants
of December 2, 1961, as revised at Geneva on November 10, 1972, and on October 23, 1978

Application to Aruba: Proposal

The Secretary-General of the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) presents his compliments to the Minister for Foreign Affairs and has the honor to refer to the attached Note (Ref. No. gev/sa-5041/96), of January 11, 1996, of the Permanent Mission of the Kingdom of Netherlands to the United Nations Office at Geneva, concerning the application to Aruba of the International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants of December 2, 1961, as revised at Geneva on November 10, 1972, and on October 23, 1978, and setting forth the proposal of the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands "that the Kingdom ceases to be bound by the said Convention in respect of Aruba, with retroactive effect to the date on which the application was extended to Aruba." It is recalled that the said International Convention became applicable to Aruba with effect from November 8, 1986 (see UPOV Notification No. 34).

With a view to giving effect to the procedure set forth by the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in that Note, His Excellency's Government is hereby invited to communicate to the Secretary-General of UPOV, within a period of six months from the date of the present notification, any objection against the procedure or the proposal set forth in the attached Note of the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

February 13, 1996

Permanent Mission of the Kingdom of the Netherlands to the Office of the United Nations

To: Secretary-General of the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants

No. gev/sa-5041/96

The Permanent Mission of the Kingdom of the Netherlands to the Office of the United Nations and other International Organisations at Geneva presents its compliments to the Secretary-General of the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) and, with reference to the Mission's Note no. 655 of 14 February 1986, has the honour to draw the Secretary-General's attention to the following.

In the aforesaid Note, the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands extended to Aruba the application of the International Convention for the protection of new varieties of plants of December 2, 1961, as revised at Geneva on November 10, 1972, and on October 23, 1978. However, it has now become evident that the application of the Convention was extended erroneously to Aruba, as no new varieties of plants are cultivated on Aruba. Also, Aruba has no legislation to implement the Convention and, therefore, would be unable to comply with the Convention.

Although no contact has taken place between any of the Parties and Aruba with regard to the application of this treaty, and although, in practice there have not been any difficulties, the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands deems it desirable to rectify what is legally a dubious situation. Therefore, the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands would propose that the Kingdom ceases to be bound by the said Convention in respect of Aruba, with retroactive effect to the date on which the application was extended to Aruba.

The Government bases its proposal on the principle of international law laid down in Article 54 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969, in accordance with which the withdrawal from a treaty may take place at any time by consent of all the Parties after consultation with the other Contracting States.

In accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 65 of the Convention on the Law of Treaties, the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands will deem such consent to have been given as regards the withdrawal in respect of Aruba, if none of the Contracting Parties has lodged an objection thereto with the Depositary within six months of the date of the notification of the proposal by the Depositary to all Parties and other Contracting States. The Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands will then deposit with the Depositary the instrument of withdrawal from the Convention in regard to Aruba, in compliance with the procedure laid down in Article 67, paragraph 2, of the Convention on the Law of Treaties.

The Permanent Mission of the Kingdom of the Netherlands would request the Depositary to notify all Parties and other Contracting States accordingly, and would appreciate receiving a copy of this notification.

The Permanent Mission of the Kingdom of the Netherlands avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Secretary-General of the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants the assurances of its highest consideration.

Geneva, 11 January 1996