Registrar sees that the extension is required for reasons over which the applicant or his representative have no control or are unable to prevent. (g) Where an application that was examined in accordance with this section was accepted, its examination shall be noted by way of publication in accordance with section 26 and in the Register, and the date of conducting the examination and the date and number of application of the same kind that was examined shortly before the earlier examination in accordance with this section shall be noted, according to the classification customary in the Authority. (h) The provisions set forth in this section shall not derogate from the powers vested to the Registrar or an examiner in accordance with section 19."
9. In section 26(b) of the Principal Law, paragraph (5) shall be deleted. 10. Section 27 of the Principal Law – repealed. 11. In section 164(a) of the Principal Law, after "in sections" the following shall be
inserted: "18(b)(3) for the purpose of submitting documents by a person other than the applicant."
12. In section 165(a) of the Principal Law, instead of "18(a)(1)" the following shall be inserted: "18(a)(5)" and instead of "in accordance with section 26" the following shall be inserted: "in respect of which a notice pursuant to section 16A or section 26, upon the earlier."
13. In section 168A of the Principal Law, instead of "under section 26" the following shall be inserted: "in respect of which a notice pursuant to section 16A or section 26, upon the earlier."
14. In section 176 of the Principal Law, instead of "section 26" the following shall be inserted: "section 16A or 26, upon the earlier."
15. In section 179 of the Principal Law, instead of the final part starting with the words: "the Court" the following shall be inserted: "the Court –
(1) shall grant compensation for exploitation of an invention that was performed after the publication date in accordance with section 16A and before the publication date in accordance with section 26; the said compensation shall be in the amount of reasonable royalties that the party in breach was required to pay if it had been granted a license to exploit the invention in the scope of the said exploitation, however no compensation shall be granted for exploitation of an invention as said unless the Court found that it constituted infringement of the patent as granted and on the
Amendment of section 26 Repeal of section 27 Amendment of section 164
Amendment of section 165
Amendment of section 168
Amendment of section 176
Amendment of section 179