À propos de la propriété intellectuelle Formation en propriété intellectuelle Respect de la propriété intellectuelle Sensibilisation à la propriété intellectuelle La propriété intellectuelle pour… Propriété intellectuelle et… Propriété intellectuelle et… Information relative aux brevets et à la technologie Information en matière de marques Information en matière de dessins et modèles industriels Information en matière d’indications géographiques Information en matière de protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Lois, traités et jugements dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Ressources relatives à la propriété intellectuelle Rapports sur la propriété intellectuelle Protection des brevets Protection des marques Protection des dessins et modèles industriels Protection des indications géographiques Protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Règlement extrajudiciaire des litiges Solutions opérationnelles à l’intention des offices de propriété intellectuelle Paiement de services de propriété intellectuelle Décisions et négociations Coopération en matière de développement Appui à l’innovation Partenariats public-privé Outils et services en matière d’intelligence artificielle L’Organisation Travailler avec nous Responsabilité Brevets Marques Dessins et modèles industriels Indications géographiques Droit d’auteur Secrets d’affaires Académie de l’OMPI Ateliers et séminaires Application des droits de propriété intellectuelle WIPO ALERT Sensibilisation Journée mondiale de la propriété intellectuelle Magazine de l’OMPI Études de cas et exemples de réussite Actualités dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Prix de l’OMPI Entreprises Universités Peuples autochtones Instances judiciaires Ressources génétiques, savoirs traditionnels et expressions culturelles traditionnelles Économie Financement Actifs incorporels Égalité des genres Santé mondiale Changement climatique Politique en matière de concurrence Objectifs de développement durable Technologies de pointe Applications mobiles Sport Tourisme PATENTSCOPE Analyse de brevets Classification internationale des brevets Programme ARDI – Recherche pour l’innovation Programme ASPI – Information spécialisée en matière de brevets Base de données mondiale sur les marques Madrid Monitor Base de données Article 6ter Express Classification de Nice Classification de Vienne Base de données mondiale sur les dessins et modèles Bulletin des dessins et modèles internationaux Base de données Hague Express Classification de Locarno Base de données Lisbon Express Base de données mondiale sur les marques relative aux indications géographiques Base de données PLUTO sur les variétés végétales Base de données GENIE Traités administrés par l’OMPI WIPO Lex – lois, traités et jugements en matière de propriété intellectuelle Normes de l’OMPI Statistiques de propriété intellectuelle WIPO Pearl (Terminologie) Publications de l’OMPI Profils nationaux Centre de connaissances de l’OMPI Série de rapports de l’OMPI consacrés aux tendances technologiques Indice mondial de l’innovation Rapport sur la propriété intellectuelle dans le monde PCT – Le système international des brevets ePCT Budapest – Le système international de dépôt des micro-organismes Madrid – Le système international des marques eMadrid Article 6ter (armoiries, drapeaux, emblèmes nationaux) La Haye – Le système international des dessins et modèles industriels eHague Lisbonne – Le système d’enregistrement international des indications géographiques eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Médiation Arbitrage Procédure d’expertise Litiges relatifs aux noms de domaine Accès centralisé aux résultats de la recherche et de l’examen (WIPO CASE) Service d’accès numérique aux documents de priorité (DAS) WIPO Pay Compte courant auprès de l’OMPI Assemblées de l’OMPI Comités permanents Calendrier des réunions WIPO Webcast Documents officiels de l’OMPI Plan d’action de l’OMPI pour le développement Assistance technique Institutions de formation en matière de propriété intellectuelle Mesures d’appui concernant la COVID-19 Stratégies nationales de propriété intellectuelle Assistance en matière d’élaboration des politiques et de formulation de la législation Pôle de coopération Centres d’appui à la technologie et à l’innovation (CATI) Transfert de technologie Programme d’aide aux inventeurs WIPO GREEN Initiative PAT-INFORMED de l’OMPI Consortium pour des livres accessibles L’OMPI pour les créateurs WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Assistant de classification États membres Observateurs Directeur général Activités par unité administrative Bureaux extérieurs Avis de vacance d’emploi Achats Résultats et budget Rapports financiers Audit et supervision
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Lois Traités Jugements Recherche par ressort juridique

Chine

CN027-j

Retour

Beijing Quna Information Technology Co., Ltd. V. Guangzhou Quna Information Technology Co., Ltd (2013) YGFMSZZ No. 565, Guangdong Higher People’s Court

BEIJING QUNA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. V. GUANGZHOU QUNA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. (2013) YGFMSZZ No. 565, Guangdong Higher People’s Court

 

Cause of action: Dispute alleging unfair competition

 

Collegial panel members: Yue Lihao | Yu Jie | Shi Jinghan

 

Keywords: domain name, specific name of famous service, unfair competition

 

Relevant legal provisions: Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Civil Dispute Cases Regarding Computer Network Domain Names, article 4

 

Basic facts: On May 9, 2005, Zhuang Chenchao registered the domain name “qunar.com” and established the “qunar” website. After Beijing Quna Information Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Beijing Quna Company”) was incorporated and registered with the Industry and Commerce Authority on March 17, 2006, the domain name “qunar.com” was transferred by Zhuang Chenchao (Beijing Quna Company’s legal representative) to Beijing Quna Company. After years of use, service logos such as 去哪儿 (pronounced qunar, meaning “where to go”), 去哪儿网 (pronounced qunar wang, meaning “where to go website”) and “qunar.com” became the specific names of a famous service.

 

Guangzhou Quna Information Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Guangzhou Quna Company”) was formerly known as Guangzhou Longyou Xianzong Travel Agency Co., Ltd., which was founded on December 10, 2003, and covered a scope of business similar to that of Beijing Quna Company. On June 6, 2003, the domain name “quna.com” was registered. After several transfers, it was acquired by Yuan Jingen (Guangzhou Quna Company’s legal representative) on May 9, 2009. On May 26, 2009, the renaming of Guangzhou Quna Company was approved and the domain name “quna.com” was transferred to it soon afterwards. Guangzhou Quna Company subsequently registered domain names “123quna.com” and “mquna.com”, and used 去哪 (pronounced quna, meaning “where to go”), 去哪儿 (pronounced qunar, meaning “where to go”), 去哪网 (pronounced quna wang, meaning “where to go website”) and “quna.com” in its external publicity materials and operations.

 

On April 25, 2011, Beijing Quna Company filed a lawsuit in the court of first instance against Guangzhou Quna Company, alleging that its use of “quna”, “qunar”, “quna wang” and “quna.com” in its external publicity materials and operations constituted unfair competition, and asking the court to order Guangzhou Quna Company to immediately cease its unfair competition and pay damages of RMB3 million to Beijing Quna Company for its economic losses.

 

Held: Guangzhou Intermediate People’s Court delivered its judgment ((2011) SZFMSCZ No. 217) on June 9, 2013, holding that both Beijing Quna Company and Guangzhou Quna Company provided online travel services and there existed competition between them. The commercial marks “qunar”, “qunar wang” and “qunar.com” used by Beijing Quna Company were the specific names of a famous service. Guangzhou Quna Company’s use of the commercial marks “quna”, “qunar”, “quna wang” and “quna.com” constituted an infringement of Beijing Quna Company’s right to those names, and Guangzhou Quna Company’s use of the word “quna” in its company name constituted unfair competition. Guangzhou Quna Company’s use of the domain names “quna.com”, “123quna.com” and “mquna.com” constituted an infringement of Beijing Quna Company’s interests in the domain name. The court therefore:

 

(a) ordered Guangzhou Quna Company to cease using “quna” as its company name;

 

(b) ordered Guangzhou Quna Company to cease using “quna”, “qunar”, “quna wang” and “quna.com” as its service marks;

 

(c) ordered Guangzhou Quna Company to cease using the domain names “quna.com”, “123quna.com” and “mquna.com”, and to transfer these domain names to Beijing Quna Company within the stipulated time limit;

 

(d) ordered Guangzhou Quna Company to pay RMB350,000 to Beijing Quna Company to compensate it for its economic losses; and

 

(e) dismissed all other claims of Beijing Quna Company.

 

Dissatisfied with the judgment, Guangzhou Quna Company appealed to the Guangdong Higher People’s Court, arguing that its domain name “quna.com” was legitimately registered on June 6, 2003, and was thus an existing prior right. Furthermore, it argued that it had no malicious intent in acquiring the domain name “quna.com” and subsequently registering the domain names “123quna.com” and “mquna.com”.

 

The second-instance court delivered its judgment on March 19, 2014, holding that “qunar”, “qunar wang” and “qunar.com”, as used by Beijing Quna Company, constituted specific names of a famous service, and that Guangzhou Quna Company’s use of the word “quna” as its company name constituted unfair competition. However, it found Guangzhou Quna Company’s use of domain names “quna.com”, “123quna.com” and “mquna.com” to be the exercise of existing prior rights, which had a legal basis. The court of second instance therefore:

 

(a) affirmed the first-instance decision that Guangzhou Quna Company be ordered to cease using “quna” in its company name and using marks such as “quna”;

 

(b) set aside the first-instance decision that Guangzhou Quna Company cease using the domain names “quna.com”, “123quna.com” and “mquna.com” and the order that it transfer these domain names to Beijing Quna Company within the stipulated time limit; and

 

(c) reduced the amount of compensation to RMB250,000 accordingly.

 

Reasoning: At second instance, the dispute focused on whether the use of domain names “quna.com”, “123quna.com” and “mquna.com” by Guangzhou Quna Company had a legal basis.

 

According to article 4 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Civil Dispute Cases Regarding Computer Network Domain Names: In the trial of domain name dispute cases, the people’s court shall find the respondent’s registration and use of a domain name to be an infringement or unfair competition when the following conditions are satisfied:

 

1) the civil rights and interests claimed by the plaintiff for protection are legitimate and valid;

 

2) the defendant’s domain name or its main part constitutes the reproduction, imitation, translation or transliteration of the plaintiff’s well-known trademark, or is same as or similar to the plaintiff’s registered trademark and domain name, etc., enough to cause confusion among the relevant public;

 

 3) the defendant has neither rights and interests in the domain name or its main part, nor justifiable cause to register or use such domain name;

 

4) the defendant registers or uses the domain name with a malicious intent.

 

The key to determining whether Guangzhou Quna Company had engaged in unfair competition was whether its use of the domain names satisfied all of these four elements.

 

(a) On the use of the domain name “quna.com”, the court of second instance opined that Guangzhou Quna Company enjoyed legitimate rights and interests in the domain name “quna.com”, and had justifiable cause to use it; failing this third requirement, Guangzhou Quna Company’s action did not constitute unfair competition. The reason was as follows.

 

(i) On June 6, 2003, the domain name “quna.com” was registered for the first time, but it was not until May 9, 2005, some two years after the initial registration of “quna.com”, that the domain name “qunar.com” was registered and the website created. The registration of “quna.com” was therefore legitimate. After several transfers, Yuan Jingen (Guangzhou Quna Company’s legal representative) acquired the domain name “quna.com” on May 9, 2009, and Guangzhou Quna Company later acquired it on July 3, 2009. Such transfers did not break the law and hence the law should not interfere with Guangzhou Quna Company’s use of its legally acquired domain name “quna.com”.

 

 (ii) On August 27, 2010, Beijing Quna Company submitted to the Beijing Secretariat of the Asian Domain Name Dispute Resolution Center a letter of complaint against Guangzhou Quna Company’s use of the domain name “quna.com”, requesting that this domain name be transferred to Beijing Quna Company. According to the expert panel, the complainant could not satisfy the three conditions stipulated in the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy and hence there was no reason to grant its request to “order the respondent to transfer the disputed domain name to the complainant”. This further proved that Guangzhou Quna Company had justifiable cause to use the domain name “quna.com”.

 

(iii) Because domain names are limited in length and quantity, similar domain names are registerable. The only difference between Beijing Quna Company’s domain name “qunar.com” and Guangzhou Quna Company’s domain name “quna.com” was the dropped letter “r”. Although the two domain names are similar, the two parties are obliged to tolerate the possible confusion between these two domain names in their use. If the confusion created by the use of the two domain names were to be used as a basis to argue that Guangzhou Quna Company used the domain name “quna.com” out of malicious intent, and to further infer that Guangzhou Quna Company’s acquisition of the domain name “quna.com” had no justifiable cause and hence constituted unfair competition, such logic would not hold water.

 

(b) On the use of the domain names “123quna.com” and “mquna.com”, these are more similar to the domain name “quna.com” used by Guangzhou Quna Company than to Beijing Quna Company’s domain name “qunar.com”. Because Guangzhou Quna Company had justifiable cause to use the domain name “quna.com”, the domain names “123quna.com” and “mquna.com” registered afterwards should also be allowed to be registered and used. In conclusion, there were valid reasons for Guangzhou Quna Company to argue that it had a legal basis to use the domain names “quna.com”, “123quna.com” and “mquna.com”. The court of second instance supported its appeal according to law.

 

As also noted by the court of second instance, both parties in this case enjoyed rights and interests in domain names with legitimate sources, and therefore they were ordered to tolerate, respect and coexist with each other over the long term. Neither party was permitted to deprive the other of its living space on the basis that its own popularity has increased nor was one party to maliciously exploit the higher goodwill of the more well-known party to achieve improper business advantages. Guangzhou Quna Company should therefore have the right to continuously use the domain names “quna.com”, “123quna.com” and “mquna.com”, but be obligated to add corresponding distinguishing marks on the domainname- related search links and websites so that consumers can distinguish between these and “qunar”, “qunar wang” and “qunar.com”, which are the specific names of Beijing Quna Company’s famous service.