Referred point of law re-phrased (yes),
Uniform application of the law (yes),
Point of law of fundamental importance (yes),
Different decisions by two Boards of Appeal (yes),
Application of Article 112(1)(b) EPC by analogy (no),
Rules of interpretation,
Hierarchy of norms,
Dynamic interpretation of Article 53(b) EPC (yes),
Impact of Rule 28(2) EPC on interpretation of Article 53(b) EPC (yes),
Admissibility of referral by the President of the European Patent Office (yes, after re-phrasing),
Conflicting provisions (no of laws)