About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Finance Intangible Assets Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

Trade Marks (Border Enforcement Measures) (Amendment) Rules 2018 (G.N. No. S 557/2018), Singapore

Back
Latest Version in WIPO Lex
Details Details Year of Version 2018 Dates Entry into force: October 10, 2018 Issued: September 10, 2018 Type of Text Implementing Rules/Regulations Subject Matter Trademarks

Available Materials

Main Text(s) Related Text(s)
Main text(s) Main text(s) English Trade Marks (Border Enforcement Measures) (Amendment) Rules 2018 (G.N. No. S 557/2018)        
 Trade Marks (Border Enforcement Measures) (Amendment) Rules 2018 (G.N. No. S 557/2018)

First published in the Government Gazette, Electronic Edition, on 10 September 2018 at 5 pm.

No. S 557

TRADE MARKS ACT (CHAPTER 332)

TRADE MARKS (BORDER ENFORCEMENT MEASURES)

(AMENDMENT) RULES 2018

In exercise of the powers conferred by section 108 of the Trade Marks Act, the Minister for Law makes the following Rules:

Citation and commencement

1. These Rules are the Trade Marks (Border Enforcement Measures) (Amendment) Rules 2018 and come into operation on 10 October 2018.

Deletion and substitution of rule 2

2. Rule 2 of the Trade Marks (Border Enforcement Measures) Rules (R 2) (called in these Rules the principal Rules) is deleted and the following rule substituted therefor:

“Definitions

2. In these Rules —

“authorised officer” and “Director‑General” have the meanings given by section 81 of the Act;

“officer of customs” has the meaning given by section 3(1) of the Customs Act (Cap. 70).”.

New rules 9A, 9B and 9C

3. The principal Rules are amended by inserting, immediately after rule 9, the following rules:

S 557/20181

“Written undertakings for forfeiture by consent of goods seized on request

9A. For the purposes of section 87(1) of the Act, the prescribed written undertakings are that the importer must —

(a) propose an arrangement for the disposal of the seized goods for the Director‑General’s approval; and

(b) dispose of the seized goods in accordance with an arrangement approved by the Director‑General —

(i) within one month after the date of a notice given by the Director‑General; and

(ii) under the supervision of an officer of customs.

Written undertakings for forfeiture by consent of goods detained under section 93A of Act

9B. For the purposes of section 87(1) of the Act as applied by section 93A(5)(b) of the Act, the prescribed written undertakings are that the exporter or the consignee (as the case may be) must —

(a) propose an arrangement for the disposal of the detained goods for the Director‑General’s approval; and

(b) dispose of the detained goods in accordance with an arrangement approved by the Director‑General —

(i) within one month after the date of a notice given by the Director‑General; and

(ii) under the supervision of an officer of customs.

Disposal of seized or detained goods forfeited by consent

9C.—(1) Upon forfeiture of the goods to the Government under section 87(3) of the Act, or that provision as applied by section 93A(5)(b) of the Act, the seized or detained goods must be disposed of by the importer, exporter or consignee (as the case may be) in accordance with an arrangement approved by the Director‑General —

S 557/2018 2

(a) within one month after the date of a notice given by the Director‑General; and

(b) under the supervision of an officer of customs.

(2) If the importer, exporter or consignee (as the case may be) does not dispose of the goods within the period mentioned in paragraph (1)(a), the Director‑General must dispose of those goods in such manner as the Director‑General thinks fit.”.

Amendment of Schedule

4. The Schedule to the principal Rules is amended —

(a) by deleting the words “or expense which it may incur as a result of seizing the goods” in paragraph 6(a) and substituting the words “or reasonable expense it is likely to incur in relation to the seizure, storage and disposal of the goods”;

(b) by deleting the words “a company” in paragraph (8) under the Explanatory Notes and substituting the words “an entity”; and

(c) by deleting the words “the company” wherever they appear in paragraph (8) under the Explanatory Notes and substituting in each case the words “the entity”.

[G.N. No. S 371/2004]

Made on 10 September 2018.

NG HOW YUE Permanent Secretary,

Ministry of Law, Singapore.

[MLAW/52/005; AG/LEGIS/SL/332/2015/3 Vol. 1]

S 557/20183


Legislation Amends (1 text(s)) Amends (1 text(s)) Implements (1 text(s)) Implements (1 text(s))
No data available.

WIPO Lex No. SG123