About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working at WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets Future of IP WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Youth Examiners Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Finance Intangible Assets Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism Music PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Staff Positions Non-staff Positions Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

Japan

JP055-j

1999(Ju)955, Minshu Vol. 55, No. 1

Machine translation
close
tranlsation detector

Date of Judgment: 13.02.2001

 

Issuing Authority: Supreme Court

 

Level of the Issuing Authority: Final Instance

 

Type of Procedure: Judicial (Civil)

 

Subject Matter: Copyright and Related Rights (Neighboring Rights)

 

Main text of the judgment (decision):

1. The appeal shall be dismissed.

2. The cost of the appeal shall be borne by the appellant.

 

Reasons:

1. An outline of the case

In this case, the appellee, who holds an author’s moral right over the computer game software “D” (hereinafter referred to as the “Game Software”), claims compensation for mental suffering alleging that the appellant’s acts of import and sale of a memory card whose trade name is “X-TERMINATOR for PS Ver. 2E” (hereinafter referred to as the Memory Card”) infringe the appellee’s right of integrity.

An outline of the facts related to the case which duly became final and binding in the judgment of prior instance is as described below:

(1) The appellee holds an author’s moral right over the Game Software. The Game Software is a love simulation game in which the main character (i.e., the player) of the game becomes a student of a fictitious high school, selects his favorite schoolgirl from among the characters in the game and, with the aim of receiving a confession of love from this schoolgirl on the graduation day, steps up efforts through studying, incidents, events, etc., he experiences during three years, to develop his capabilities that deserve to receive a confession of love from his favorite schoolgirl.

In the Game Software, the player’s capability values are set at default values in the form of nine types of apparent parameters (physical condition, humanities, science, arts, sports, wide knowledge, appearance, willpower and stress) and three types of hidden parameters (levels of thrill, friendship and heartbreak, which indicate the schoolgirl’s evaluation of the player; together with the apparent parameters, hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parameters”). The commands that can be selected by the player are predetermined and the Parameters are set so that the player’s choice of command results in some Parameters rising while others falling in a linked manner. Whether or not the player can receive a confession of love from the schoolgirl is determined depending on the values of the Parameters achieved by the player. In the Game Software, the main story is that the player starts from the default capability values and improves his own capabilities with a goal of receiving a confession of love from his favorite schoolgirl. In the process, the Game Software provides settings where the player meets other schoolgirls according to the level of capability values achieved by him. The story unfolds within certain limits under certain conditions.

(2) The appellant imported the Memory Card and sold 522 units of it. The Memory Card contains, in its units of data storage (i.e., blocks 1 through 13), the Parameters used in the Game Software in data form. When executing the program of the Game Software, the player can read the data contained in any block of the Memory Card into the hardware of the game machine and use such data.

(3) Since the Game Software provides a setting where the player starts from low capability values and where the player’s choice of command results in some Parameters rising while others falling in a linked manner, even if the player is successful in raising apparent parameters in the most efficient manner, he can, at the most, achieve high values in a small number of specific apparent parameters at a time just before graduation; it is impossible for the player to achieve high values in most of the nine apparent parameters solely by his own manipulations. In addition, the story is supposed to unfold based on the assumption that no schoolgirls appear until the values of the apparent parameters reach a certain level. In contrast, if the data contained in any of blocks 1 through 11 of the Memory Card is used, most of the apparent parameters other than stress reach extremely high values at a time just after entrance into school and, because these values allow the player to play at a level of achievement satisfactory to his favorite schoolgirl, other schoolgirls who are not originally supposed to appear from just after the entrance into school do appear.

In addition, if the data contained in block 12 or 13 is used, the starting time of the game leaps to a time just before graduation. At the same time, the data contained there results in all apparent parameters other than stress being replaced with high values that are originally impossible, as well as the values of the hidden parameters reaching a level that is necessary to receive a confession of love from the player’s favorite schoolgirl, allowing the player to receive a confession of love from his favorite schoolgirl without fail.

 

2. Regarding section 4 of the reasons for the petition for acceptance of final appeal filed by the counsels for the appeal, YAMAMOTO Norio and YAMAMOTO Tomoko The images used in the Game Software constitute works as defined in Article 2, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Copyright Act, since these images are products in which thoughts or sentiments are expressed in a creative way and which falls within the literary, scientific, artistic or musical domain. [Summary 1] Under the factual circumstances described above, it is appropriate to understand that use of the Memory Card infringes the appellee’s right of integrity by modifying the Game Software. This is because, while the parameters in the Game Software express the player’s personality and the story unfolds with changes in these parameters, use of the Memory Card modifies the player’s personality expressed by the parameters set in the Game Software, resulting in the story of the Game Software unfolding beyond the scope originally planned and being so modified.

The ruling by the court of prior instance, which is consistent with the above, is acceptable as legitimate, and the judgment of prior instance has no alleged illegality. The gist of the argument of the petition for appeal is not acceptable, since it merely criticizes the judgment of prior instance from a unique perspective.

 

3. Regarding section 5 of the reasons for the petition for acceptance of final appeal filed by the counsels for the appeal, YAMAMOTO Norio and YAMAMOTO Tomoko As described above, use of the Memory Card infringes the appellee’s right to preserve the integrity of the Game Software. According to the facts found as described above, the appellant imported and sold the Memory Card which is intended exclusively to modify the Game Software, and many people actually purchased the Memory Card. As long as this is true, the appellant is considered to have placed the Memory Card in circulation, with the expectation that there would be people who will actually use the Memory Card. On the other hand, according to the facts described above, people who actually purchased the Memory Card are presumed to have actually used it. This means that their use of the Memory Card infringed the appellee’s right to preserve the integrity of the Game Software and that, without the appellant’s acts described above, the infringement of the appellee’s right to preserve the integrity of the Game Software would not have occurred. Therefore, [Summary 2] it is appropriate to understand that the appellant, who imported and sold the Memory Card intended exclusively to modify the Game Software and who placed the Memory Card in circulation with the intention of allowing others to use the same, is liable to compensate the appellee for damage based on tort, on the grounds that such use of the Memory Card by others resulted in an infringement of the appellee’s right to preserve the integrity of the Game Software.

The ruling of the court of prior instance concerning the point at issue is legitimate in conclusion, and the judgment of prior instance has no alleged illegality. The gist of the argument of the petition for appeal is not acceptable.

Accordingly, the Court unanimously decides as set forth in the main text.

(This translation is provisional and subject to revision.)