关于知识产权 知识产权培训 树立尊重知识产权的风尚 知识产权外联 部门知识产权 知识产权和热点议题 特定领域知识产权 专利和技术信息 商标信息 外观设计信息 地理标志信息 植物品种信息(UPOV) 知识产权法律、条约和判决 知识产权资源 知识产权报告 专利保护 商标保护 外观设计保护 地理标志保护 植物品种保护(UPOV) 知识产权争议解决 知识产权局业务解决方案 知识产权服务缴费 谈判与决策 发展合作 创新支持 公私伙伴关系 人工智能工具和服务 组织简介 在产权组织任职 问责制 专利 商标 外观设计 地理标志 版权 商业秘密 知识产权的未来 WIPO学院 讲习班和研讨会 知识产权执法 WIPO ALERT 宣传 世界知识产权日 WIPO杂志 案例研究和成功故事 知识产权新闻 产权组织奖 企业 高校 土著人民 司法机构 青年 审查员 创新生态系统 经济学 金融 无形资产 性别平等 全球卫生 气候变化 竞争政策 可持续发展目标 遗传资源、传统知识和传统文化表现形式 前沿技术 移动应用 体育 旅游 音乐 时尚 PATENTSCOPE 专利分析 国际专利分类 ARDI - 研究促进创新 ASPI - 专业化专利信息 全球品牌数据库 马德里监视器 Article 6ter Express数据库 尼斯分类 维也纳分类 全球外观设计数据库 国际外观设计公报 Hague Express数据库 洛迦诺分类 Lisbon Express数据库 全球品牌数据库地理标志信息 PLUTO植物品种数据库 GENIE数据库 产权组织管理的条约 WIPO Lex - 知识产权法律、条约和判决 产权组织标准 知识产权统计 WIPO Pearl(术语) 产权组织出版物 国家知识产权概况 产权组织知识中心 全球无形资产投资精要 产权组织技术趋势 全球创新指数 世界知识产权报告 PCT - 国际专利体系 ePCT 布达佩斯 - 国际微生物保藏体系 马德里 - 国际商标体系 eMadrid 第六条之三(徽章、旗帜、国徽) 海牙 - 国际外观设计体系 eHague 里斯本 - 国际地理标志体系 eLisbon UPOV PRISMA 调解 仲裁 专家裁决 域名争议 检索和审查集中式接入(CASE) 数字查询服务(DAS) WIPO Pay 产权组织往来账户 产权组织各大会 常设委员会 会议日历 WIPO Webcast 产权组织正式文件 发展议程 技术援助 知识产权培训机构 重建基金 国家知识产权战略 政策和立法咨询 合作枢纽 技术与创新支持中心(TISC) 技术转移 发明人援助计划(IAP) WIPO GREEN 产权组织的PAT-INFORMED 无障碍图书联合会 产权组织服务创作者 WIPO Translate 语音转文字 分类助手 成员国 观察员 总干事 部门活动 驻外办事处 工作人员职位 附属人员职位 采购 成果和预算 财务报告 监督
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
法律 条约 判决 按管辖区浏览

日本

JP055-j

返回

1999(Ju)955, Minshu Vol. 55, No. 1

Date of Judgment: 13.02.2001

 

Issuing Authority: Supreme Court

 

Level of the Issuing Authority: Final Instance

 

Type of Procedure: Judicial (Civil)

 

Subject Matter: Copyright and Related Rights (Neighboring Rights)

 

Main text of the judgment (decision):

1. The appeal shall be dismissed.

2. The cost of the appeal shall be borne by the appellant.

 

Reasons:

1. An outline of the case

In this case, the appellee, who holds an author’s moral right over the computer game software “D” (hereinafter referred to as the “Game Software”), claims compensation for mental suffering alleging that the appellant’s acts of import and sale of a memory card whose trade name is “X-TERMINATOR for PS Ver. 2E” (hereinafter referred to as the Memory Card”) infringe the appellee’s right of integrity.

An outline of the facts related to the case which duly became final and binding in the judgment of prior instance is as described below:

(1) The appellee holds an author’s moral right over the Game Software. The Game Software is a love simulation game in which the main character (i.e., the player) of the game becomes a student of a fictitious high school, selects his favorite schoolgirl from among the characters in the game and, with the aim of receiving a confession of love from this schoolgirl on the graduation day, steps up efforts through studying, incidents, events, etc., he experiences during three years, to develop his capabilities that deserve to receive a confession of love from his favorite schoolgirl.

In the Game Software, the player’s capability values are set at default values in the form of nine types of apparent parameters (physical condition, humanities, science, arts, sports, wide knowledge, appearance, willpower and stress) and three types of hidden parameters (levels of thrill, friendship and heartbreak, which indicate the schoolgirl’s evaluation of the player; together with the apparent parameters, hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parameters”). The commands that can be selected by the player are predetermined and the Parameters are set so that the player’s choice of command results in some Parameters rising while others falling in a linked manner. Whether or not the player can receive a confession of love from the schoolgirl is determined depending on the values of the Parameters achieved by the player. In the Game Software, the main story is that the player starts from the default capability values and improves his own capabilities with a goal of receiving a confession of love from his favorite schoolgirl. In the process, the Game Software provides settings where the player meets other schoolgirls according to the level of capability values achieved by him. The story unfolds within certain limits under certain conditions.

(2) The appellant imported the Memory Card and sold 522 units of it. The Memory Card contains, in its units of data storage (i.e., blocks 1 through 13), the Parameters used in the Game Software in data form. When executing the program of the Game Software, the player can read the data contained in any block of the Memory Card into the hardware of the game machine and use such data.

(3) Since the Game Software provides a setting where the player starts from low capability values and where the player’s choice of command results in some Parameters rising while others falling in a linked manner, even if the player is successful in raising apparent parameters in the most efficient manner, he can, at the most, achieve high values in a small number of specific apparent parameters at a time just before graduation; it is impossible for the player to achieve high values in most of the nine apparent parameters solely by his own manipulations. In addition, the story is supposed to unfold based on the assumption that no schoolgirls appear until the values of the apparent parameters reach a certain level. In contrast, if the data contained in any of blocks 1 through 11 of the Memory Card is used, most of the apparent parameters other than stress reach extremely high values at a time just after entrance into school and, because these values allow the player to play at a level of achievement satisfactory to his favorite schoolgirl, other schoolgirls who are not originally supposed to appear from just after the entrance into school do appear.

In addition, if the data contained in block 12 or 13 is used, the starting time of the game leaps to a time just before graduation. At the same time, the data contained there results in all apparent parameters other than stress being replaced with high values that are originally impossible, as well as the values of the hidden parameters reaching a level that is necessary to receive a confession of love from the player’s favorite schoolgirl, allowing the player to receive a confession of love from his favorite schoolgirl without fail.

 

2. Regarding section 4 of the reasons for the petition for acceptance of final appeal filed by the counsels for the appeal, YAMAMOTO Norio and YAMAMOTO Tomoko The images used in the Game Software constitute works as defined in Article 2, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Copyright Act, since these images are products in which thoughts or sentiments are expressed in a creative way and which falls within the literary, scientific, artistic or musical domain. [Summary 1] Under the factual circumstances described above, it is appropriate to understand that use of the Memory Card infringes the appellee’s right of integrity by modifying the Game Software. This is because, while the parameters in the Game Software express the player’s personality and the story unfolds with changes in these parameters, use of the Memory Card modifies the player’s personality expressed by the parameters set in the Game Software, resulting in the story of the Game Software unfolding beyond the scope originally planned and being so modified.

The ruling by the court of prior instance, which is consistent with the above, is acceptable as legitimate, and the judgment of prior instance has no alleged illegality. The gist of the argument of the petition for appeal is not acceptable, since it merely criticizes the judgment of prior instance from a unique perspective.

 

3. Regarding section 5 of the reasons for the petition for acceptance of final appeal filed by the counsels for the appeal, YAMAMOTO Norio and YAMAMOTO Tomoko As described above, use of the Memory Card infringes the appellee’s right to preserve the integrity of the Game Software. According to the facts found as described above, the appellant imported and sold the Memory Card which is intended exclusively to modify the Game Software, and many people actually purchased the Memory Card. As long as this is true, the appellant is considered to have placed the Memory Card in circulation, with the expectation that there would be people who will actually use the Memory Card. On the other hand, according to the facts described above, people who actually purchased the Memory Card are presumed to have actually used it. This means that their use of the Memory Card infringed the appellee’s right to preserve the integrity of the Game Software and that, without the appellant’s acts described above, the infringement of the appellee’s right to preserve the integrity of the Game Software would not have occurred. Therefore, [Summary 2] it is appropriate to understand that the appellant, who imported and sold the Memory Card intended exclusively to modify the Game Software and who placed the Memory Card in circulation with the intention of allowing others to use the same, is liable to compensate the appellee for damage based on tort, on the grounds that such use of the Memory Card by others resulted in an infringement of the appellee’s right to preserve the integrity of the Game Software.

The ruling of the court of prior instance concerning the point at issue is legitimate in conclusion, and the judgment of prior instance has no alleged illegality. The gist of the argument of the petition for appeal is not acceptable.

Accordingly, the Court unanimously decides as set forth in the main text.

(This translation is provisional and subject to revision.)