AtrásFecha de la sentencia16 de julio de 2019Órgano emisorCámaras de Recursos: Alta Cámara de RecursosInstanciaInstancia FinalTipo de procedimientoJudicial (Contencioso Administrativo)MateriaPatentes (Invenciones)Palabras clave
Right of a third party within the meaning of Article 115 EPC to oral proceedings on appeal against a lack of clarity in granted patent claims (no),
Examination by the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the grounds for admissibility of a referral under Article 112(1)(a) EPC,
Suspensive effect of an appeal filed by a third party within the meaning of Article 115 EPC against a lack of clarity in granted patent claims (no),
Oral proceedings before the boards of appeal in Haar (permissible)