À propos de la propriété intellectuelle Formation en propriété intellectuelle Respect de la propriété intellectuelle Sensibilisation à la propriété intellectuelle La propriété intellectuelle pour… Propriété intellectuelle et… Propriété intellectuelle et… Information relative aux brevets et à la technologie Information en matière de marques Information en matière de dessins et modèles industriels Information en matière d’indications géographiques Information en matière de protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Lois, traités et jugements dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Ressources relatives à la propriété intellectuelle Rapports sur la propriété intellectuelle Protection des brevets Protection des marques Protection des dessins et modèles industriels Protection des indications géographiques Protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Règlement extrajudiciaire des litiges Solutions opérationnelles à l’intention des offices de propriété intellectuelle Paiement de services de propriété intellectuelle Décisions et négociations Coopération en matière de développement Appui à l’innovation Partenariats public-privé Outils et services en matière d’intelligence artificielle L’Organisation Travailler avec nous Responsabilité Brevets Marques Dessins et modèles industriels Indications géographiques Droit d’auteur Secrets d’affaires Académie de l’OMPI Ateliers et séminaires Application des droits de propriété intellectuelle WIPO ALERT Sensibilisation Journée mondiale de la propriété intellectuelle Magazine de l’OMPI Études de cas et exemples de réussite Actualités dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Prix de l’OMPI Entreprises Universités Peuples autochtones Instances judiciaires Ressources génétiques, savoirs traditionnels et expressions culturelles traditionnelles Économie Financement Actifs incorporels Égalité des genres Santé mondiale Changement climatique Politique en matière de concurrence Objectifs de développement durable Technologies de pointe Applications mobiles Sport Tourisme PATENTSCOPE Analyse de brevets Classification internationale des brevets Programme ARDI – Recherche pour l’innovation Programme ASPI – Information spécialisée en matière de brevets Base de données mondiale sur les marques Madrid Monitor Base de données Article 6ter Express Classification de Nice Classification de Vienne Base de données mondiale sur les dessins et modèles Bulletin des dessins et modèles internationaux Base de données Hague Express Classification de Locarno Base de données Lisbon Express Base de données mondiale sur les marques relative aux indications géographiques Base de données PLUTO sur les variétés végétales Base de données GENIE Traités administrés par l’OMPI WIPO Lex – lois, traités et jugements en matière de propriété intellectuelle Normes de l’OMPI Statistiques de propriété intellectuelle WIPO Pearl (Terminologie) Publications de l’OMPI Profils nationaux Centre de connaissances de l’OMPI Série de rapports de l’OMPI consacrés aux tendances technologiques Indice mondial de l’innovation Rapport sur la propriété intellectuelle dans le monde PCT – Le système international des brevets ePCT Budapest – Le système international de dépôt des micro-organismes Madrid – Le système international des marques eMadrid Article 6ter (armoiries, drapeaux, emblèmes nationaux) La Haye – Le système international des dessins et modèles industriels eHague Lisbonne – Le système d’enregistrement international des indications géographiques eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Médiation Arbitrage Procédure d’expertise Litiges relatifs aux noms de domaine Accès centralisé aux résultats de la recherche et de l’examen (WIPO CASE) Service d’accès numérique aux documents de priorité (DAS) WIPO Pay Compte courant auprès de l’OMPI Assemblées de l’OMPI Comités permanents Calendrier des réunions WIPO Webcast Documents officiels de l’OMPI Plan d’action de l’OMPI pour le développement Assistance technique Institutions de formation en matière de propriété intellectuelle Mesures d’appui concernant la COVID-19 Stratégies nationales de propriété intellectuelle Assistance en matière d’élaboration des politiques et de formulation de la législation Pôle de coopération Centres d’appui à la technologie et à l’innovation (CATI) Transfert de technologie Programme d’aide aux inventeurs WIPO GREEN Initiative PAT-INFORMED de l’OMPI Consortium pour des livres accessibles L’OMPI pour les créateurs WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Assistant de classification États membres Observateurs Directeur général Activités par unité administrative Bureaux extérieurs Avis de vacance d’emploi Achats Résultats et budget Rapports financiers Audit et supervision
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Lois Traités Jugements Recherche par ressort juridique

Arrêté de l'Office n° 186, Série 2010 sur le renforcement de l'application des droits de propriété intellectuelle en modifiant certaines dispositions du Règlement sur ​​les plaintes administratives pour violation de la loi concernant les droits de propriété intellectuelle, Philippines

Retour
Version la plus récente dans WIPO Lex
Détails Détails Année de version 2010 Dates Entrée en vigueur: 1 janvier 2011 Émis: 6 décembre 2010 Type de texte Textes règlementaires Sujet Mise en application des droits Sujet (secondaire) Organe de réglementation de la PI Notes Cet arrêté a été publié par l'Office de la propriété intellectuelle des Philippines (IPO) afin de modifier les règles et règlements sur les plaintes administratives pour violation de la loi concernant les droits de propriété intellectuelle du 28 mai 2001.

Documents disponibles

Texte(s) principal(aux) Textes connexe(s)
Texte(s) princip(al)(aux) Texte(s) princip(al)(aux) Anglais Office Order No. 186, Series of 2010, Enhancing the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights by Amending Certain Provisions of the Regulations on Administrative Complaints for Violation of Law Involving Intellectual Property Rights        
 Office Order No. 186 of 2010, Enhancing the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights by Amending Certain Provisions of the Regulations on Administrative Complaints for Violations of Law Involving IP Rights

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY P H I L I P P I N E S

OFFICE ORDER NO. 18 6 Se r ies 00010.

SUBJECT: ENHANCING THE ENFORCEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS BY AMENDING CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF TH E REGULATIONS ON ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINTS FOR VIO LATION OF LAW INVOLViNG INTELLECT UAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPV RUL ES)

W he reas, it is the pol icy of the Intellectual Prop ert y Office to co nt inuous ly review and streamline its operations, sys tems, processes, inc lud ing administra tive procedures, in resolving disputes and co ntroversies invo lving intell ectual property rights;

Whereas, under Sec. 10.3 of Rep. Act No. 8293, also known as the Intellectual Property Co de of the Philippi nes ("IP Co de"), the Director Gene ra l may by regulations es ta blish the proce dure to govern administra tive procee din gs;

Whereas, under Sec . 7 (a) of the IP Code, the Direc to r General sha ll manage and direct all functions and act ivities of the Office, includ ing the promul gat ion of rules and regul ations to implement the objectives, po licies, plan s, programs and projects of the Office ;

Whereas, the rules and regulations on ad ministrat ive complaints whi ch took effect on December 17, 1998 was modified, whi ch Modi fied Rules and Regulati ons on Administrati ve Co mp laints took effect on March 28, 200 1;

Whereas, the re is a need to furth er amend the Regul at ions on -Adm inistrative co mplaints in order to ac hieve a more effic ient and _.,ped itious reso lution of adminis trat ive complaints, inc luding the ava iling of provisional remedies for agg rieved IPR ow ners aga inst IPR violators, in the Bureau of Legal Affairs;

Now, Wherefore, the Regulations on Administrative Complaints f or Violation of Law Involving Intellectual Property Rights, as mod ified, is hereby further amended as follows:

Republic of the Philippines INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE 11,-,

351 Sen. Gil Puyat Ave., Makati City 1200 Philippines · www.ipophil.gov.ph Telephone : +632 -7525450 to 65 • Facsimile : +632-8904862 • email: mai1@ipophil.gov.ph

SECTION 1. The first paragraph of Sec. 6 of Rule 2 is hereby amended to read, as follows:

"Section 6. Payment of Filing Fee and Docketing. - The complaint shall be filed in duplicate with the Bureau, which shall issue an order for the payment of the required fee."

SECTION 2. Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Rule 5 of the Rules and Regulations on Administrative Complaints for Violation of Law Involving Intellectual Property Rights are amended, to read as follows:

"Section 3. Verified Application and Bond for Preliminary Injunction or Temporary Restraining Order . - A preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order may be granted only upon compliance with the following:

(a) The application in the action or proceeding is verified and shows facts entitling the applicant to the relief demanded;

(b) Unless exempted, the applicant files with the Bureau a cash bond executed to the party or person enjoined in an amount to be fixed by the Hearing Officer and approved by the Director, or in his/her aosence, the Assistant Director, to the effect that the applicant will pay to such party or person all damages which the latter may sustain by reason of the injunction or temporary restraining order if the Bureau should finally decide that the applicant was not entitled thereto. Upon posting of the required bond, a writ of preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order shall be issued. The posting of surety bond in lieu of cash bond shall be governed by the appropriate guidelines that may be issued by the IPO.

(c) When an application for a writ of preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order is included in a complaint or any initiatory pleading, the case shall be assigned to a Hearing Officer after due notice to the adverse party or the person to be enjoined . In any event, such notice shall be preceded, or accompanied by service of summons, together with a copy of the complaint or initiatory pleading and the applicant's affidavit upon the adverse party in the Philippines. However, where the summons could not be served personally or by substituted service despite diligent efforts, or the adverse party is a resident of the Philippines temporarily absent therefrom or is a non-resident thereof, the requirement of prior or contemporaneous service of summons shall not apply.

Section 4. When Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) May Be Granted. ­ A temporary restraining order may be granted subject to the following procedure:

2 of 6

(a) The complaint with an application for the issuance of a temporary restraining order and/or a writ of preliminary injunction filed before the Bureau shall have attached thereto the affidavit/s of the complainant's witness/es and the originals or certified true copies of the supporting document/s thereof, in support of the application.

(b) Within 24 hours from receipt of the application for TRO and the supporting documents, the Bureau shall issue a notice to respondent to file its counter-affidavits, including the affidavits of witness/es and the supporting document/s thereof, within a non-extendible period of ten (10) days from receipt of said notice.

Notwithstanding the absence of all/some of the documents/papers/ evidence required herein from the parties, the Hearing Officer shall make an evaluation or assessment of the application on the basis of the allegations stated in the appl ication and whatever documents/papers/evidence, if any, that may be attached to the records.

(c) Thereafter, the Hearing Officer shall draft the resolution on the application within ten (10) days from receipt by the Bureau of the respondent's counter-affidavits with the originals or certified true copies ofthe supporting documents thereof.

(d) If it shall appear that great and irreparable injury would result to the applicant, the Hearing Officer may then issue a temporary restraining order (TRO) with the approval of the Director, or in hislher absence, the Assistant Director, to be effective only for a period of twenty (20) days from service on the party or person sought to be enjoined.

No motion for reconsideration of the grant of an appl ication for the issuance of a TRO shall be allowed.

(e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the matter is of extreme urgency and the applicant will suffer grave injustice and irreparable injury, the Hearing Officer, and as approved by the Director, or in his/her absence, the Assistant Director, and with the concurrence of the Director General, or in hislher absence, the Deputy Director General-in-Charge of the IPO, may issue ex parte a temporary restraining order effective for only seventy-two (72) hours from issuance, but shall immediately comply with the provisions of the preceding paragraphs and Section 3 hereof, as to service of summons and the documents to be served therewith. The TRO shall include an order for the parties to submit before the expiry of the seventy­ two (72) hour period to submit their respective memoranda to determine whether the temporary restraining order shall be extended until the application for preliminary injunction can be heard. In no case shall the total period of effectivity of the temporary restraining order exceed twenty (20) days, including the original seventy-two hours (72) provided herein.

3 of 6

A certification from the 1PR owner or expert or competent authority that the products or goods involved are fake or counterfeit, and if it is determined that the continuing access thereto by the public poses danger and risk to life, health and public safety, the same may be considered a matter of extreme urgency and causes great injustice to the IPR owner/applicant.

Section 5. When Preliminary Injunction (PI) May Be Granted. - Within the 20-day period of the effectivity of the temporary restraining order, and in the manner provided under Section 4 hereof, the party or person sought to be enjoined shall show cause why the injunction should not be granted and complainant may thereafter present evidence to the contrary. If it appears that the following requisites are present, namely: I) the right of applicant is clear and unmistakable; 2) the invasion of the right is material and substantial; and 3) there is an urgent and permanent necessity for the writ to prevent serious damage, the Hearing Officer shall issue the writ of preliminary injunction with the approval of the Director, or in his/her absence, by the Assistant Director. The writ of preliminary injunction shall be effective until further orders.

The TRO and Preliminary Injunction may include, among other things, prohibiting the concerned party/ies from using, displaying, marketing, offering for sale, distributing, transporting, removing, relocating, altering the nature or substance of the subject goods or services, and other restrictions as the Bureau may deem appropriate.

Section 6. Grounds for objection to, or for motion of dissolution of, injunction or restraining order. The application for injunction or restraining order may be denied, upon showing of its insufficiency. If granted, the injunction or restraining order may be subsequently dissolved upon filing of a motion by the respondent. The Hearing Officer shall then immediately issue an order setting a hearing on the motion within forty­ eight (48) hours from filing of the same. During such hearing, the Hearing Officer shall rule on the motion after both parties shall have presented their respective evidence.

The application for injunction or restraining order may further be denied, or, if granted, may be dissolved, if it appears after hearing that although the applicant is entitled to the injunction or restraining order, the issuance or continuance thereof, as the case may be, would cause irreparable damage to the party or person enjoined while the applicant can be fully compensated for such damages as he may suffer, and the former files a bond in an amount fixed by the Hearing Officer, conditioned that he will pay all damages which the applicant may suffer by the denial or the dissolution of the injunction or restraining order. If it appears that the extent of the preliminary injunction or restraining order granted is too great, it may be modified.

4 of 6

Section 7. When TRO Or PI Is Denied. - If it shall not appear that great injustice or irreparable injury would result to the applicant, the Hearing Officer shall issue an order denying the application for the issuance of a temporary restraining order which shall be noted by the Director, or in his absence, the Assistant Director.

If it shall not appear that the requisites provided under Section 5 hereof are complied with, the Hearing Officer shall issue an order denying the application for the issuance of a writ of preliminary injunction which shall be noted by the Director."

SECTION 3. Sec. 4 of Rule 7 is hereby amended to read, as follows:

"Section 4. Ass ignment 0/ Cases . - The case shall be assigned to a Hearing Officer to preside or conduct the proceedings from commencement until its final resolution."

SECTION 4. Introduction of Forensic Evidence. - Sec. 1 of Rule 10 of the IPV Rules is hereby amended to read, as follows:

"Section I. Evidence required. - Substantial evidence shall be sufficient to support a decision or order.

A fact may be deemed established if it is supported by substantial evidence. ft means such relevant evidence which a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support or justify a conclusion. The Bureau shall allow the presentation or submission of forensic evidence which may be admitted and given weight."

SECTION 5. Separability - If any provision of this Order or applicat ion of such provisions to any circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of these amendments shall not be affected thereby.

SECTION 6. Filing a/Certified Copies - The Record Officer of the Bureau of Legal Affairs is hereby directed to immediately file three (3) certified copies of these Rules with the UP Law Center, and one (I) certified copy each with the Department of Trade and Industry, the Senate of the Philippines, the House of Representatives, the Supreme Court of the Philippines, and The National Library.

5 of 6

SECTION 7. Effectivity - These amendments shall be published in a newspaper of general cireulation and thereafter, shall take effect on 0I January 20 II .

Done this 6th day of Deeember 2010, Makati City.

R1CA~~AFLOR DIRECTOR GENERAL

6 o f 6


Législation Modifie (1 texte(s)) Modifie (1 texte(s)) Met en application (1 texte(s)) Met en application (1 texte(s))
Aucune donnée disponible

N° WIPO Lex PH095