À propos de la propriété intellectuelle Formation en propriété intellectuelle Respect de la propriété intellectuelle Sensibilisation à la propriété intellectuelle La propriété intellectuelle pour… Propriété intellectuelle et… Propriété intellectuelle et… Information relative aux brevets et à la technologie Information en matière de marques Information en matière de dessins et modèles industriels Information en matière d’indications géographiques Information en matière de protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Lois, traités et jugements dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Ressources relatives à la propriété intellectuelle Rapports sur la propriété intellectuelle Protection des brevets Protection des marques Protection des dessins et modèles industriels Protection des indications géographiques Protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Règlement extrajudiciaire des litiges Solutions opérationnelles à l’intention des offices de propriété intellectuelle Paiement de services de propriété intellectuelle Décisions et négociations Coopération en matière de développement Appui à l’innovation Partenariats public-privé Outils et services en matière d’intelligence artificielle L’Organisation Travailler avec nous Responsabilité Brevets Marques Dessins et modèles industriels Indications géographiques Droit d’auteur Secrets d’affaires Académie de l’OMPI Ateliers et séminaires Application des droits de propriété intellectuelle WIPO ALERT Sensibilisation Journée mondiale de la propriété intellectuelle Magazine de l’OMPI Études de cas et exemples de réussite Actualités dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Prix de l’OMPI Entreprises Universités Peuples autochtones Instances judiciaires Ressources génétiques, savoirs traditionnels et expressions culturelles traditionnelles Économie Financement Actifs incorporels Égalité des genres Santé mondiale Changement climatique Politique en matière de concurrence Objectifs de développement durable Technologies de pointe Applications mobiles Sport Tourisme PATENTSCOPE Analyse de brevets Classification internationale des brevets Programme ARDI – Recherche pour l’innovation Programme ASPI – Information spécialisée en matière de brevets Base de données mondiale sur les marques Madrid Monitor Base de données Article 6ter Express Classification de Nice Classification de Vienne Base de données mondiale sur les dessins et modèles Bulletin des dessins et modèles internationaux Base de données Hague Express Classification de Locarno Base de données Lisbon Express Base de données mondiale sur les marques relative aux indications géographiques Base de données PLUTO sur les variétés végétales Base de données GENIE Traités administrés par l’OMPI WIPO Lex – lois, traités et jugements en matière de propriété intellectuelle Normes de l’OMPI Statistiques de propriété intellectuelle WIPO Pearl (Terminologie) Publications de l’OMPI Profils nationaux Centre de connaissances de l’OMPI Série de rapports de l’OMPI consacrés aux tendances technologiques Indice mondial de l’innovation Rapport sur la propriété intellectuelle dans le monde PCT – Le système international des brevets ePCT Budapest – Le système international de dépôt des micro-organismes Madrid – Le système international des marques eMadrid Article 6ter (armoiries, drapeaux, emblèmes nationaux) La Haye – Le système international des dessins et modèles industriels eHague Lisbonne – Le système d’enregistrement international des indications géographiques eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Médiation Arbitrage Procédure d’expertise Litiges relatifs aux noms de domaine Accès centralisé aux résultats de la recherche et de l’examen (WIPO CASE) Service d’accès numérique aux documents de priorité (DAS) WIPO Pay Compte courant auprès de l’OMPI Assemblées de l’OMPI Comités permanents Calendrier des réunions WIPO Webcast Documents officiels de l’OMPI Plan d’action de l’OMPI pour le développement Assistance technique Institutions de formation en matière de propriété intellectuelle Mesures d’appui concernant la COVID-19 Stratégies nationales de propriété intellectuelle Assistance en matière d’élaboration des politiques et de formulation de la législation Pôle de coopération Centres d’appui à la technologie et à l’innovation (CATI) Transfert de technologie Programme d’aide aux inventeurs WIPO GREEN Initiative PAT-INFORMED de l’OMPI Consortium pour des livres accessibles L’OMPI pour les créateurs WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Assistant de classification États membres Observateurs Directeur général Activités par unité administrative Bureaux extérieurs Avis de vacance d’emploi Achats Résultats et budget Rapports financiers Audit et supervision
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Lois Traités Jugements Recherche par ressort juridique

Arrêté de l'Office n° 139, série de 2012, Règlement philippin sur l'application du Protocole relatif à l'Arrangement de Madrid concernant l'enregistrement international des marques, Philippines

Retour
Texte abrogé 
Détails Détails Année de version 2012 Dates Émis: 25 juillet 2012 Type de texte Textes règlementaires Sujet Marques Sujet (secondaire) Organe de réglementation de la PI Notes Office Order No. 139, issued by the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL) pursuant to the accession of the Philippines to the Madrid Protocol on July 25, 2012, implements the provisions of the Madrid Protocol and supplements the provisions of the IP Code to govern the international registration of marks filed under the Madrid Protocol. Section 15 of the Office Order states that these Regulations take effect on July 25, 2012, after its publication in a newspaper of general circulation.

Documents disponibles

Texte(s) principal(aux) Textes connexe(s)
Texte(s) princip(al)(aux) Texte(s) princip(al)(aux) Anglais Office Order No. 139, Series of 2012, Philippine Regulations Implementing the Protocol Relating to the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks        
 Philippine Regulations Implementing the Protocol Relating to the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks" or the "Philippine Madrid Regulations

Office Order Nolt 3 9 Series of 2012

Philippine Regulations Implementing the Protocol Relating to the Madrid Agreement

Concerning the International Registrat ion of Marks

Whereas, the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL) recognizes the need of trademark holders to have access to a global infrastructure that wou ld allow them to secure protection for their marks through a simple, transparent, and cost-effective manner;

Whereas, the Protocol Relating to the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks ("Madrid Protocol ") is an international procedure that allows trademark holders to secure protection in multiple jurisdictions following a single procedure;

Whereas, as part of the continuing improvements to the trademark system in the Philippines and the IPOPHL's thrust to continue to deliver timely and quality services to trademark owners, the Republic of the Philippines acceded to the Madrid Protocol and deposited its instrument of accession with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) on 25 April 2012;

Whereas, the Madrid Protocol does not amend the laws of the Philippines, including Republic Act No. 8293 (the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines or the "IP Code");

Whereas, to implement the provisions of the Madrid Protocol and to supplement the provisions of the IP Code to govern the international registration of marks filed under the Madrid Protocol , there is a need for the IPOPHL to promulgate regulations implementing the Madrid Protoco l in the Philippines;

Now, therefo re, pursuant to the accession of the Philippines to the Madrid Protocol, the following regulations on the international registration of marks under the Madrid Protocol are hereby promulgated.

Chapter 1 General Provisions

Rule 1. Title.- These regulations shall be known as the "Philippine Regulations Implementing the Protocol Relating to the Madrid Agreement

Republic of the PhilippinesREef IUE[.l BV_ INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE

Inte ec tua l Pro perty Cen ter, 28 Upper Mckinley Road, Mckinley Hill Tow n Cente r Fort Bonifa ci o, Taguig City 1634 Philippines

T: +632-2386300 • F: +632-7980114 • www.ipophi l.gov.ph

Concerning the International Registration of Marks" or the "Philippine Madrid Regulations".

Rule 2. Definitions.- For the purpose of these regulations:

(1) "Madrid Protocol" means the Protocol Relating to the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks, adopted in Madrid, Spain on June 27, 1989;

(2) "Common Regulations" means the Common Regulations under the 1

Madrid Agreement and Madrid Protocol promulgated by the WIPO;

(3) "International application" means an application to obtain registration of a mark under the Madrid Protocol;

(4) "International registration" means the registration of a mark effected under the Madrid Protocol;

(5) "Applicant" refers to the natural person or legal entity in whose name the international application is filed;

(6) "Holder" refers to the natural person or legal entity in whose name the international registration is recorded in the International Register;

(7) "IPOPHL" means the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines, and shall pertain to the Bureau of Trademarks when reference is made to the processing of all international applications with the IPOPHL as Office of Origin and international registrations designating the Philippines, as well as to communicating with the International Bureau;

(8) "IP Code" refers to Republic Act No. 8293, otherwise known as the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines;

(9) "TM Regulations" refers to the "Rules and Regulations on Trademarks, Service Marks, Trade Names, and Marked or Stamped Containers", as amended, as well as office orders and memorandum circulars governing the registration of marks;

(10) "BLA Regulations" refers to the "Rules and Regulations on Administrative Complaints for Violation of Law Involving Intellectual Property Rights, as amended by Office Order No. 186, s. 2010," "Amendments to the Rules and Regulations on Inter Partes Proceedings (Office Order No. 99, s. 2011)," and office orders and memorandum circulars issued by the IPOPHL to

1 Madrid Agreement refers to the Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks, which was adopted on 14 April 1891. The Philippines is not a party to the Madrid Agreement.

2

govern oppositions and IP violations handled by the Bureau of Legal Affairs (BLA) of the IPOPHL;

(11) "International Bureau" means the International Bureau of WIPO;

(12) "International Register" means the official collection of data concerning international registration of marks maintained by the International Bureau;

(13) "Basic application" means an application for the registration of a mark, filed with the IPOPHL, and which is used as the basis for the filing of an international application under the Madrid Protocol;

(14) "Basic registration" means a mark registered by the IPOPHL under the IP Code, and which is used as the basis for the filing of an international application under the Madrid Protocol;

(15) "E-Gazette" pertains to the official online publication of data concerning the registration of marks maintained by the IPOPHL;

(16) "Office of Origin" means the intellectual property office of the Contracting Party where the international application originates;

(17) "Designated Contracting Party" is the country party to the Madrid Protocol that is designated in the international application.

Rule 3. Coverage & Applicability of the Philippine Madrid Regulations and the Common Regulations.- The relevant provisions of the Common Regulations pertaining to the Madrid Protocol are hereby adopted and applied in conjunction with the Philippine Madrid Regulations. These Regulations and the Common Regulations shall apply to all international applications filed under the Madrid Protocol where IPOPHL is the Office of Origin, and international registrations where the Philippines is a Designated Contracting Party.

Rule 4. Language.- International applications and any communication for transmittal to the International Bureau through the IPOPHL shall be in English. All other documents required to be submitted directly to the IPOPHL by the applicant or holder shall also be in English.

Chapter 2 International Applications Originating from the Philippines

Rule 5. Minimum Requirements for Acceptance of International Applications filed with the IPOPHL as Office of Origin.- The following minimum requirements shall be contained in the application form:

(1) name and address and contact details of the applicant or the address and contact details of his representative, if any;

3

(2) the Designated Contracting Parties;

(3) reproduction of the mark;

(4) indication of the goods and services for which registration of the mark is sought.

Rule 6. Examination of International Applications with the IPOPHL as Office of Origin.- Where an international application is filed with the IPOPHL for transmittal to the International Bureau, the IPOPHL shall verify if the Philippines may be considered as the country of origin in respect of that application, and that the relevant particulars appearing in the international application correspond to those appearing in the basic application or basic registration, as the case may be, in accordance with the provisions of the Common Regulations.

Rule 7. Certification.­

(1) Where the international application complies with the prescribed requirements, the IPOPHL shall so certify in the international application, indicating also the date on which the international application was received, and shall forward the international application to the International Bureau.

(2) Where the international application does not meet the prescribed requirements, the IPOPHL shall not forward it to the International Bureau, and shall inform the applicant accordingly.

Rule 8. Handling Fee.- Aside from the fees collected by the International Bureau, a non-refundable handling fee shall be payable to IPOPHL upon the filing of an international application for the processing, certification, and transmittal of the application to the International Bureau. The application will not be processed unless the handling fee is paid in full.

Chapter 3 International Registrations with the Philippines as a

Designated Contracting Party

Rule 9. Allowance of a Mark; Publication for Opposition.- Where the Philippines has been designated in an international registration, the IPOPHL shall undertake the substantive examination of the mark in accordance with the IP Code and the TM Regulations. Upon completion of the substantive examination and the mark is allowed, the mark shall be published for purposes of opposition in the IPOPHL's e-Gazette. Opposition proceedings shall be governed by the provisions of the IP Code, the TM Regulations, the BLA Regulations, and the Uniform Rules on Appeal.

Rule 10. Ex-Officio Provisional Refusal of Protection.- Where the IPOPHL finds that, in accordance with the IP Code and the TM Regulations,

4

the mark that is the subject of an international registration designating the Philippines cannot be protected, the IPOPHL shall, before the expiry of the refusal period under Article 5(2)(b) of the Madrid Protocol, notify the International Bureau of a provisional refusal of protection following the requirements of the Madrid Protocol and the Common Regulations. The holder of that international registration shall enjoy the same remedies as if the mark had been filed for registration directly with the IPOPHL.

Rule 11. Provisional Refusal Based on an Opposition.- Where an opposition is filed with the IPOPHL in respect of an international registration designating the Philippines, the IPOPHL shall, before the expiry of the refusal period under Article 5(2)(c) of the Madrid Protocol, notify the International Bureau of a provisional refusal based on an opposition following the requirements of the Madrid Protocol and the Common Regulations. The holder of that international registration shall enjoy the same remedies as if the mark had been filed for registration directly with the IPOPHL under the IP Code and the TM Regulations.

Rule 12. No Grounds for Refusal; Statement of Grant of Protection.­ Where all procedures, including publication for opposition, before the IPOPHL have been completed, and there is no ground for the IPOPHL to refuse protection, the IPOPHL shall, as soon as possible and before the expiry of the refusal period under Article 5(2) of the Madrid Protocol, send to the International Bureau a statement to the effect that protection is granted to the mark in the Philippines.

Rule 13. Final Decision Following the Notification of a Provisional Refusal.­

(1) Statement of Grant of Protection. Where the IPOPHL has notified to the International Bureau a provisional refusal of protection in accordance with Rule 10 or Rule 11, with all the procedures before the IPOPHL having been completed and such provisional refusal has been either totally or partially withdrawn, the IPOPHL shall send to the International Bureau either

(a) a statement to the effect that the provisional refusal is withdrawn, and that protection of the mark is granted in the Philippines for all the goods and services for which protection has been requested; or

(b) a statement to the effect that the provisional refusal is withdrawn, and that protection of the mark is granted in the Philippines for some of the goods and services for which protection has been requested, and specifying therein the goods and services for which protection is granted.

(2) Confirmation of Total Refusal. Where the IPOPHL has sent to the International Bureau a notification of provisional refusal in accordance with Rule 10 or Rule 11, with all the procedures before the IPOPHL having been completed, and the IPOPHL has decided to confirm such refusal of protection

5

of the mark in the Philippines for all the goods and services for which protection has been requested or the opposition to the registration of the mark has been upheld by the Director of the Bureau of Legal Affairs of the IPOPHL or by the Director General of IPOPHL upon an appeal, but regardless of any appeal to the regular courts, the IPOPHL shall send to the International Bureau a statement to the effect that there is total refusal of protection of the mark.

Rule 14. Further Decision Affecting Protection of a Mark.­ Notwithstanding the statements sent to the International Bureau in accordance with Rule 13, the IPOPHL shall notify the International Bureau of any subsequent decision affecting the protection of the mark in the Philippines as soon as it receives any such information from the applicant, the court, or any interested party. The notification shall contain a statement indicating the goods or services for which the mark is protected in the Philippines.

Rule 15. Effects of an International Registration.­

(1) An international registration designating the Philippines shall have the same effect, from the date of the international registration, as if an application for the registration of the mark had been filed directly with the IPOPHL under the IP Code and the TM Regulations.

(2) If no refusal is notified by the IPOPHL to the International Bureau in accordance with the Madrid Protocol and the Common Regulations, or if a refusal has been so notified but has been subsequently withdrawn, or if a statement of grant of protection is sent by the IPOPHL, the protection of the mark in the Philippines shall be the same as if the mark had been registered directly by the IPOPHL on the date of the international registration.

Rule 16. Cancel/ation.- Where the effects of an international registration are cancelled in the Philippines, and the cancellation is no longer subject to appeal, the IPOPHL shall, as soon as it is informed of that decision, notify accordingly the International Bureau in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Madrid Protocol and the Common Regulations.

Rule 17. Ceasing of Effect of the Basic Application or Basic Registration.- Where, in accordance with Article 6 of the Madrid Protocol, the basic application, the registration resulting from such application, or the basic registration, ceases to have effect, the IPOPHL, as the Office of Origin, shall inform the International Bureau accordingly, and shall request the cancellation of the international registration in respect of the goods and services affected.

Rule 18. Recordings in the International Register.- Any recording made in the International Register in respect of an international registration, shall, to the extent that it applies to the Philippines as a Designated Contracting Party, have the same effect as if it had been recorded by the IPOPHL in its register of marks. In the case of license contracts, publication by the International

6

Bureau shall have the effect of national publication stipulated in Section 150.2 of the IP Code. However, within 2 months from the recording of the license contract with the International Bureau, the holder must provide a copy of the license contract directly to the IPOPHL showing compliance with Sections 87, 88, and 150.1 of the IP Code, otherwise the recording of the license contract shall not have effect in the Philippines. The license contract shall be reviewed and a certification of compliance with the IP Code provisions shall be issued in accordance with the TM Regulations, otherwise the contract shall not be enforceable.

Rule 19. Collective Marks.- Where an international registration designating the Philippines is a collective mark, a copy of the agreement governing the use of such collective mark shall be submitted directly by the holder of the international registration to the IPOPHL within two months 'from the date of international registration with the International Bureau. The international registration will not be examined unless the agreement is received by the IPOPHL.

Rule 20. Declaration ofActual Use.­

(1) All holders of international registrations that designate the Philippines shall file a declaration of actual use of the mark directly with the IPOPHL, with the required evidence attached thereto, within three years from the date of the international registration. The holder may, within the same three-year period, request a non-extendible period of six months within which to file the declaration of actual use. The actual use of the mark may commence within the extension period. In the event that the holder fails to submit the declaration of actual use within the period, the mark shall be removed by the IPOPHL from its register. The IPOPHL shall inform the International Bureau accordingly.

(2) All holders of international registrations shall file a declaration of actual use and evidence to that effect, or shall show valid reasons based on the existence of obstacles to such use, as prescribed by the TM Regulations, within one (1) year from the fifth anniversary of the date of the international registration of the mark and within one (1) year from the fifth anniversary of the date of renewal of registration of the mark. If the declaration of actual use is not submitted within the prescribed period, the IPOPHL shall remove the mark from the Register and notify the International Bureau accordingly.

The requirements for the filing of the declaration of actual use under paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be the same as those prescribed in the TM Regulations.

Rule 21. Replacement.­

(1) (a) The holder of an international registration may request the IPOPHL to take note of that international registration in the register where

7

(i) a mark registered in the Philippines is also the subject of an international registration, and the protection resulting therefrom extends to the Philippines; and

(ii) the same person is recorded as holder of the registration in the Philippines and of the international registration; and

(iii) all the goods and services listed in the registration in the Philippines are also listed in the international registration in respect of the Philippines; and

(iv) the extension of that international registration to Philippines took effect after the date of registration of the mark in Philippines.

(b) The request for replacement filed with the IPOPHL in accordance with paragraph 1(a), shall be made in the prescribed form and shall be subject to the payment of the prescribed fee.

(c) Replacement is without prejudice to any rights acquired by virtue of the earlier national registration.

(2) Where the IPOPHL has taken note of an international registration in accordance with paragraph (1)(a), the IPOPHL shall notify the International Bureau accordingly. Such notification shall indicate the following:

(a) the number of the international registration;

(b) where only some of the goods and services listed in the international registration are concerned, those goods and services;

(c) the filing date and number of the application for registration of the mark in the Philippines;

(d) the registration date and number of the registration in the Philippines; and

(e) the priority date, if any, of the registration in the Philippines.

Rule 22. Transformation.­

(1) (a) Where an international registration designating the Philippines is cancelled at the request of the Office of Origin, in accordance with Article 6(4) of the Madrid Protocol, in respect of all or some of the goods and services listed in the international registration, an application may be made to the IPOPHL, within three months from the date on which the international registration was cancelled, by the

8

person who was the holder of the international registration at the date of its cancellation, for registration of the same mark ("an application resulting from transformation"), in respect of goods and services covered by the list of goods and services contained in the international registration.

(b) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), the provisions applicable to a trademark application filed directly with the IPOPHL shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application resulting from transformation.

(2) (a) An application resulting from transformation shall be made in the prescribed form and shall, in addition, include the following:

(i) a statement that the application is made by way of transformation;

(ii) the international registration number of the international registration which has been cancelled;

(iii) the date of the said international registration, or the date of recording of the territorial extension made subsequently to the international registration, as appropriate;

(iv) the date on which the cancellation of the international registration was recorded; and

(v) where applicable, the date of any priority claimed in the international application and recorded in the International Register;

(b) An application resulting from transformation shall be subject to the payment of the prescribed transformation fee.

(3) (a) Where an international mark has become protected in the Philippines on or before the date on which the international registration was cancelled and, provided that all the requirements relating to an application resulting from transformation have been met, that mark shall be registered by the IPOPHL without need to undergo another substantive examination. The date of registration shall be the date of the cancelled international registration, or the date of recording of the territorial extension to the Philippines made subsequently to the international registration, as appropriate, and that registration shall enjoy any priority enjoyed by the cancelled international registration.

(b) Where an international mark has not yet become protected in the Philippines on or before the date on which the international registration was cancelled, any procedures or measures already undertaken on or before the date on which an application resulting from transformation is filed for the purpose

9

of the international registration shall be considered as having been undertaken for the purposes of the application resulting from transformation. The filing date of the application resulting from transformation shall be the date of the international registration or the date of recording of the territorial extension to the Philippines made subsequently to the international registration, as appropriate.

Chapter 3 Final Provisions

Rule 23. Separability.- In the event that any provision of these regulations or the application of any provision is declared invalid, the remaining provisions of the regulations will not be affected by such declaration.

Rule 24. Effectivity.- These regulations shall take effect on 25 July 2012, after publication in a newspaper of general circulation.

Done this 13th day of June 2012; Taguig City, Philippines.

RI~R.B~OR Director General

1tl


Législation Met en application (1 texte(s)) Met en application (1 texte(s)) est modifié(e) par (1 texte(s)) est modifié(e) par (1 texte(s)) est abrogé(e) par (1 texte(s)) est abrogé(e) par (1 texte(s))
Traités Se rapporte à (2 documents) Se rapporte à (2 documents)
Aucune donnée disponible

N° WIPO Lex PH105