À propos de la propriété intellectuelle Formation en propriété intellectuelle Respect de la propriété intellectuelle Sensibilisation à la propriété intellectuelle La propriété intellectuelle pour… Propriété intellectuelle et… Propriété intellectuelle et… Information relative aux brevets et à la technologie Information en matière de marques Information en matière de dessins et modèles industriels Information en matière d’indications géographiques Information en matière de protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Lois, traités et jugements dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Ressources relatives à la propriété intellectuelle Rapports sur la propriété intellectuelle Protection des brevets Protection des marques Protection des dessins et modèles industriels Protection des indications géographiques Protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Règlement extrajudiciaire des litiges Solutions opérationnelles à l’intention des offices de propriété intellectuelle Paiement de services de propriété intellectuelle Décisions et négociations Coopération en matière de développement Appui à l’innovation Partenariats public-privé Outils et services en matière d’intelligence artificielle L’Organisation Travailler avec nous Responsabilité Brevets Marques Dessins et modèles industriels Indications géographiques Droit d’auteur Secrets d’affaires Académie de l’OMPI Ateliers et séminaires Application des droits de propriété intellectuelle WIPO ALERT Sensibilisation Journée mondiale de la propriété intellectuelle Magazine de l’OMPI Études de cas et exemples de réussite Actualités dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Prix de l’OMPI Entreprises Universités Peuples autochtones Instances judiciaires Ressources génétiques, savoirs traditionnels et expressions culturelles traditionnelles Économie Financement Actifs incorporels Égalité des genres Santé mondiale Changement climatique Politique en matière de concurrence Objectifs de développement durable Technologies de pointe Applications mobiles Sport Tourisme PATENTSCOPE Analyse de brevets Classification internationale des brevets Programme ARDI – Recherche pour l’innovation Programme ASPI – Information spécialisée en matière de brevets Base de données mondiale sur les marques Madrid Monitor Base de données Article 6ter Express Classification de Nice Classification de Vienne Base de données mondiale sur les dessins et modèles Bulletin des dessins et modèles internationaux Base de données Hague Express Classification de Locarno Base de données Lisbon Express Base de données mondiale sur les marques relative aux indications géographiques Base de données PLUTO sur les variétés végétales Base de données GENIE Traités administrés par l’OMPI WIPO Lex – lois, traités et jugements en matière de propriété intellectuelle Normes de l’OMPI Statistiques de propriété intellectuelle WIPO Pearl (Terminologie) Publications de l’OMPI Profils nationaux Centre de connaissances de l’OMPI Série de rapports de l’OMPI consacrés aux tendances technologiques Indice mondial de l’innovation Rapport sur la propriété intellectuelle dans le monde PCT – Le système international des brevets ePCT Budapest – Le système international de dépôt des micro-organismes Madrid – Le système international des marques eMadrid Article 6ter (armoiries, drapeaux, emblèmes nationaux) La Haye – Le système international des dessins et modèles industriels eHague Lisbonne – Le système d’enregistrement international des indications géographiques eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Médiation Arbitrage Procédure d’expertise Litiges relatifs aux noms de domaine Accès centralisé aux résultats de la recherche et de l’examen (WIPO CASE) Service d’accès numérique aux documents de priorité (DAS) WIPO Pay Compte courant auprès de l’OMPI Assemblées de l’OMPI Comités permanents Calendrier des réunions WIPO Webcast Documents officiels de l’OMPI Plan d’action de l’OMPI pour le développement Assistance technique Institutions de formation en matière de propriété intellectuelle Mesures d’appui concernant la COVID-19 Stratégies nationales de propriété intellectuelle Assistance en matière d’élaboration des politiques et de formulation de la législation Pôle de coopération Centres d’appui à la technologie et à l’innovation (CATI) Transfert de technologie Programme d’aide aux inventeurs WIPO GREEN Initiative PAT-INFORMED de l’OMPI Consortium pour des livres accessibles L’OMPI pour les créateurs WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Assistant de classification États membres Observateurs Directeur général Activités par unité administrative Bureaux extérieurs Avis de vacance d’emploi Achats Résultats et budget Rapports financiers Audit et supervision
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Lois Traités Jugements Recherche par ressort juridique

Loi sur les droits de l'obtenteur (loi n° 789 du 21 août 1992), Finlande

Retour
Texte remplacé 
Détails Détails Année de version 1992 Dates Entrée en vigueur: 15 octobre 1992 Adopté/e: 21 août 1992 Type de texte Principales lois de propriété intellectuelle Sujet Brevets (Inventions), Protection des obtentions végétales Notes La notification présentée par la Finlande à l’OMC au titre de l’article 63.2 de l’Accord sur les ADPIC indique ce qui suit :
'La Loi contient des dispositions concernant le droit exclusif sur les variétés végétales et l'enregistrement d'entre eux'.

Documents disponibles

Texte(s) principal(aux) Textes connexe(s)
Texte(s) princip(al)(aux) Texte(s) princip(al)(aux) Anglais Act on Plant Variety Rights (Act No. 789 of August 21, 1992)        

Legislative Texts

LAW ON BREEDERS’ RIGHTS
of August 21, 1992*
Table of Contents
CHAPTER I CHAPTER II CHAPTER III CHAPTER IV CHAPTER V CHAPTER VI CHAPTER VII CHAPTER VIII CHAPTER IX CHAPTER X GENERAL PROVISIONS........................................................................... CONDITIONS FOR PROTECTION........................................................... SCOPE OF PROTECTION ......................................................................... APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION AND ITS CONSIDERATION................................................................................... PERIOD OF PROTECTION OF THE BREEDERS’ RIGHTS AND USE OF THE VARIETY DENOMINATION........................................... LICENSES, COMPULSORY LICENSES AND NOTATIONS IN THE REGISTER .................................................................................. TERMINATION OF THE BREEDERS’ RIGHTS...................................... PROTECTION UNDER PRIVATE LAW................................................... PENAL PROVISIONS ................................................................................ MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ............................................................ page 1 1 2 3 5 6 7 7 9 9

CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS

Section 1

Breeders’ Rights

The breeder of a plant variety or the person to whom his right has been transferred (owner of the variety) may, by application for registration, obtain the exclusive right afforded by this Law to exploit the variety.

Section 2

Scope of Application

Breeders’ rights may be granted in respect of a plant variety that belongs to a genus or species which, when cultivated in or imported to Finland, may have commercial significance here.

Further provisions shall be issued by decree on the plant genera or species of those plant varieties in respect of which the breeders’ rights may be granted.

* Entry into Force: October 15, 1992 Finnish Title: Laki Kasvinjalostajanoikeudesta Swedish Title: Lag om växtförädlarrätt English translation supplied by the Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry

Legislative Texts

CHAPTER II
CONDITIONS FOR PROTECTION

Section 3

Conditions in Respect of the Breeder

Breeders’ rights in a plant variety may be granted to

(1)
the person who has bred the variety in Finland or the party to whom his right has been transferred or
(2)
a plant breeder who is a citizen of a member State of the Union established for the international protection of new plant varieties, UPOV (Union), or his successor in title.

Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (1), breeders’ rights may also be granted in other cases if the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry deems it justified in view of Finnish plant breeding or the import of the plant variety.

Section 4

Conditions in Respect of the Variety

Breeders’ rights may be granted only to a variety:

(1)
which is clearly distinguishable by one or more important characteristics from any other variety whose existence is a matter of common knowledge at the time an application is filed,
(2)
which is sufficiently homogenous and
(3)
the essential characteristics of which are stable when the variety is reproduced in the manner proposed by the breeder.

Section 5

Novelty

Breeders’ rights may not be granted if the cultivation material of the variety has, with the consent of the breeder or his successor in title, been offered for sale or marketed

(1)
in this country before the application was filed;
(2)
abroad for longer than six years before the application was filed in the case of a vine, fruit tree, forest tree, ornamental tree or the rootstock thereof;
(3)
abroad for longer than four years when the variety in question is a plant other than one referred to in item (2).

CHAPTER III
SCOPE OF PROTECTION

Section 6

Protected Varieties in General

Under the exclusive right of the breeder, no person other than the owner of the variety may, without the authorization of the owner, use the variety for commercial purposes

(1)
by producing or importing the material of the variety for use as reproductive or vegetative propagating material or
(2)
by offering the reproductive or vegetative propagating material for sale and marketing it for reproductive or vegetative propagating purposes.

Legislative Texts

Section 7

Ornamental Plants

Breeders’ rights shall also extend to the seedlings of ornamental plants or the parts thereof normally marketed for purposes other than propagation when they are used commercially as propagating material in the production of ornamental plants or cut flowers.

Section 8

Exploitation of the Variety in Plant Breeding

The authorization of the owner of the variety shall not be required for the exploitation of a protected variety in the breeding of new varieties.

The authorization of the owner of the variety shall be required for the acts referred to in Section 6

(1)
if the acts concern a variety that has been essentially developed from a protected variety (a derived variety), unless the protected variety is itself a derived variety,
(2)
if the acts concern a variety that is not clearly distinguishable from the protected variety or
(3)
if the repeated use of propagating material of the protected variety is needed for the commercial production of another variety.

CHAPTER IV
APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION AND ITS CONSIDERATION

Section 9

Register Authority

The register authority is the Plant Variety Board, which shall maintain the plant variety register.

The Plant Variety Board shall be appointed by the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. The Board shall have a chairman, a deputy chairman and at most ten members. Each member shall have an alternate. The Board shall be appointed for a term of three years at a time. Further provisions on the Board shall be laid down by Decree.

Section 10

Application

Applications for breeders’ rights shall be made in writing to the register authority.

The application shall contain a description of how the variety in question differs from other varieties, and a variety denomination. The application shall state the name of the breeder. If a person other than the breeder of the variety applies for the breeders’ rights, such applicant shall demonstrate his right to the variety. The applicant shall state that the variety has not, before the application was filed, been offered for

sale or marketed in the manner referred to in Section 5.

The applicant shall pay the application fee.

The date on which the application documents have been furnished to the authority and the application

fee has been paid shall be entered as the date of application.

Section 11

Variety Denomination

The variety denomination must enable the variety to be identified. A denomination shall not be accepted for a variety:

(1)
if it consists solely of figures, except where this is an established practice for designating the varieties in question;
(2)
if it is liable to mislead the public;
(3)
if it is against the law, public policy or morality;

Legislative Texts

(4)
if it is liable to cause confusion with the denomination of a variety that belongs to the same or to a closely related plant species that has been entered or proposed for entry in the official register of varieties or that is used for reproductive material of such a variety;
(5)
if it is liable to cause confusion with a trademark, name, company name or other identifying mark that a person other than the applicant has protected and that would be a bar to the registration of the variety name as a trademark of the reproductive material of the plant variety or of similar products;
(6)
if it is liable to cause confusion with the trademark of plant variety material or of similar products that the applicant has protected.

Section 12

Period of Priority

If the owner of the variety has previously applied for breeders’ rights in a member State of the Union, the application, if it is filed within twelve months of the filing of the earlier application (the period of priority), shall be deemed to have been filed in Finland at the same time.

Section 13

Supplementing the Application

If the applicant has not followed the provisions and instructions issued on the filing of the application or if there is another reason why the application cannot be considered, the applicant shall be invited by an interim decision to make a statement or to supplement the application.

If the applicant has not made a statement or supplemented the application to remedy the defect within the specified period, the application shall be rejected. This consequence shall be mentioned in the interim decision.

A rejected application shall be reconsidered if, within one month of the end of the term specified in the interim decision, the applicant so requests or undertakes to supplement the application and, within the same period, pays the reapplication fee.

Section 14

Rejection of the Application

If the application cannot be approved even after the applicant has made a statement or supplemented the application, the application shall be rejected, unless there is cause to issue the applicant a new interim decision.

Section 15

Claim to a Better Right

If a person claims to the register authority that he has a better right to the variety than the applicant and the matter is in doubt, the authority shall invite him in an interim decision to institute an action in court within the period determined by the authority. If the claim is not filed within that period, the claim shall be disregarded in the consideration of the application, and that fact shall be mentioned in the interim decision.

If the issue of a better right is under consideration by a court, the consideration of the application may be postponed until the issue has been decided on a final basis.

Section 16

Transfer of the Application

If a person demonstrates to the register authority that he has a better right to the variety than the applicant, the register authority shall transfer the application to his name if he so requests. The person to whom the application is transferred shall pay a new application fee.

Until a decision is finally made on the request for transfer, the application may not be withdrawn, rejected or approved.

Legislative Texts

Section 17

Publication of the Application

If the application meets the requirements, the register authority shall, through publication of the application, provide the public with an opportunity to file claims regarding the application.

Claims regarding the application shall be filed in writing with the register authority within the period determined by it.

Section 18

Examination of the Variety

The register authority shall arrange for an examination of the plant material of the variety. The examination may be made in part or may be omitted if another official examination has previously been made of the variety.

The applicant snail supply the necessary plant material and the necessary information to the entity carrying out the examination.

The applicant who has requested priority on the basis of an application filed in another country shall have four years from the end of the period of priority to supply the plant material and the necessary data.

Section 19

Decision on the Application

After the period provided for the filing of claims has ended and the necessary examination of the variety has been carried out, the application shall be subjected to continued consideration and the register authority shall decide on the registration of the variety.

The applicant shall be given the opportunity to make a statement on the comments that have been made and the examination that has been carried out.

Section 20

Registration of the Breeders’ Rights

After the decision of the register authority referred to in Section 19 is no longer subject to ordinary channels of appeal, the variety shall be entered in the plant variety register. The registration shall be published. The applicant shall be given a certificate of registration.

A decision on the rejection of an application shall be published after it is no longer subject to ordinary channels of appeal.

CHAPTER V

PERIOD OF PROTECTION OF THE BREEDERS’ RIGHTS

AND USE OF THE VARIETY DENOMINATION

Section 21

Period of Protection

The breeders’ rights shall be valid from the date on which the register authority has taken its decision on the approval of the variety for registration. The breeders’ rights may be maintained through payment of an annual fee for twenty years from the beginning of the year following the taking of the decision.

Section 22

Use of the Variety Denomination

When reproductive or vegetative propagating material of a registered plant variety is offered for sale, its registered denomination shall be used even after the period of protection has ended or the breeders’ rights have otherwise ended.

Legislative Texts

The registered variety denomination or a denomination that is easily confused with it may not be used for a variety belonging to the same species or to a closely related species or for the reproductive or vegetative propagating material of such a variety as long as the variety denomination is registered.

CHAPTER VI
LICENSES, COMPULSORY LICENSES
AND NOTATIONS IN THE REGISTER

Section 23

License

If the owner of the variety has granted permission to another person to use the registered variety on a professional basis (license), such other person may transfer his right to a third person only if agreed.

If the license belongs to a company, it may be transferred in connection with the transfer of the company, unless otherwise agreed.

Section 24

Compulsory Licenses

If the reproductive or vegetative propagating material of a registered variety is not placed on the market under reasonable conditions and to a sufficient extent in view of the food economy or other public interest, a person who wishes to exploit the variety in Finland on a professional basis may obtain a compulsory license to do so, unless the owner of the variety has an acceptable reason for his actions. The compulsory license shall also include the right to receive a sufficient quantity of reproductive or vegetative propagating material of the variety from the owner of the variety.

A compulsory license may be granted only to a person who is deemed to have the prerequisites for exploiting, in an acceptable manner and under the conditions determined in the compulsory license, the variety that is the subject of the breeders’ rights.

The compulsory license shall not prevent the owner of the variety from himself using his right or from granting a license to the variety.

The compulsory license shall be granted by the court, which shall order to what extent the registered variety may be used and determine the remuneration as well as the other conditions of the compulsory license. The court may, at the request of the owner of the variety, withdraw the compulsory license or determine new conditions if required by essential changes in the circumstances.

Section 25

Notations in the Register

When the breeders’ rights have been transferred to another or when a license has been granted to another, a notation thereof shall be made in the plant variety register if so requested. The same shall apply to a lien on the breeders’ rights. However, the granting of a compulsory license shall always be noted in the register.

If it is shown that the license, lien or compulsory license entered in the register is no longer in force, the notation shall be deleted from the register.

A fee shall be paid for the entry of the notation in the register.

The person who has most recently been entered in the register as the owner of the variety shall be considered the owner of the variety.

Legislative Texts

CHAPTER VII

TERMINATION OF THE BREEDERS’ RIGHTS

Section 26

Renunciation of the Breeders’ Rights

The owner of the variety may renounce his right by notifying the register authority thereof in writing, in which case the authority shall delete the variety from the register.

The breeders’ rights shall end if the annual fee is not paid within the prescribed period.

Section 27

Nullity of the Rights Protected

The court shall declare the breeders’ rights null and void if the conditions laid down in Sections 2, 3, 4(1) or 5 for the granting of the rights are not complied with.

The court shall ask the register authority for a statement in cases that concern a declaration of nullity of the plant breeders’ rights.

In other cases pertaining to the right of the breeder, the court may ask the register authority for a statement if there is reason for this.

Section 28

Forfeiture of the Rights Protected

The register authority may declare the breeders’ rights forfeit if

(1)
the owner of the variety is not in a position to produce reproductive or vegetative propagating material of the variety with its characteristics as defined when the protection was granted; or
(2)
the owner of the variety does not, after being requested to do so by the register authority, provide reproductive or vegetative propagating material of the variety, the documents and other information deemed necessary for checking that the variety is maintained appropriately or if the owner of the variety does not allow inspection of the measures which have been taken for the maintenance of the variety.

CHAPTER VIII
PROTECTION UNDER PRIVATE LAW

Section 29

Prevention of Infringements

If anyone infringes the exclusive right under the breeders’ rights, the court may prohibit him from continuing or renewing the act.

Section 30

Action for a Declaratory Judgment

The owner of the variety or the person who, on the basis of a license or compulsory license, has the right to exploit the plant variety protected by the breeders’ rights may institute a declaratory action to establish whether, on the basis of the breeders’ rights that have been granted to him, he enjoys protection against others, if there is uncertainty regarding this matter and this uncertainty is to his detriment.

A person who exploits or intends to exploit a plant variety that is subject to the protection granted on the basis of the breeders’ rights may, under the same conditions, institute a declaratory action against the holder of the breeders’ rights to determine whether the granting of the breeders’ rights constitutes a bar to such activity.

Legislative Texts

Section 31

Damages

A person who infringes the breeders’ rights or the provisions of Section 22 on the exploitation of the variety denomination, deliberately or negligently, shall be required to pay damages for the exploitation of the variety and to compensate any other loss caused by the infringement. If the negligence is slight, the amount of the damages may be adjusted.

If the infringement of the breeders’ rights or the infringement of the provisions of Section 22 on the exploitation of the variety denomination is not deliberate or negligent, the infringer shall be required to pay damages only to the extent deemed reasonable.

Compensation for infringement of the breeders’ rights or for an infringement of the provisions of Section 22 on the exploitation of the variety denomination may be claimed only for the five years preceding the institution of the action for damages.

If the breeders’ rights have been declared null and void by a court decision that is no longer subject to ordinary channels of appeal, no claim for damages may be brought and no punishment may be pronounced.

In addition to the provisions of this Section on compensation, the provisions of the Damages Act (1974/412) shall apply as appropriate.

Section 32

Return of Reproductive or Vegetative Propagating Material

On application by the person that has suffered an infringement of his rights, the court may order, as it deems reasonable, that the reproductive or vegetative propagating material of the variety that is the subject of the infringement of rights shall be transferred to the infringed person in return for compensation. This shall not apply to a person who has received the reproductive or vegetative propagating material in good faith or who has a special right thereto and has not himself infringed the breeders’ rights.

The reproductive or vegetative propagating material referred to in the first paragraph above may be confiscated if the person that has suffered an infringement of his rights has requested transfer of the reproductive or vegetative propagating material as provided in Chapter VII of the Execution Act.

Section 33

Interim Protection

If, after the application referred to in Section 10 has been filed, a person other than the applicant uses on a professional basis the variety that is the subject of the application for breeders’ rights, the provisions on infringement of breeders’ rights shall apply correspondingly if the rights are subsequently granted.

The penalty referred to in Chapter IX of this Law may not be imposed for acts that took place after the application referred to in Section 10 was filed if, although they infringe the breeders’ rights, they took place before the breeders’ rights had been granted. Damages for an act that took place before publication of the application referred to in Section 17 may be ordered only in accordance with Section 31, second paragraph.

If the action for damages is brought within a year of the granting of the breeders’ rights, the provision in Section 31, third paragraph, shall not apply.

CHAPTER IX
PENAL PROVISIONS

Section 34

Infringement of Breeders’ Rights

A person who deliberately infringes the exclusive right referred to in Sections 6, 7 or 8 shall be sentenced for infringement of breeders’ rights to a fine or imprisonment of at most six months.

The public prosecutor may not bring charges for an offence unless the injured party has reported the offence for prosecution.

Legislative Texts

Section 35

Misuse of a Variety Denomination

A person who deliberately or negligently infringes the provisions of Section 22 on the use of a variety denomination shall be sentenced, unless the offence is petty, for misuse of a variety denomination to a fine.

CHAPTER X
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Section 36

Use of an Agent

If the applicant or the holder of the breeders’ rights does not reside in Finland, he shall have an agent in Finland authorized to represent him in all matters pertaining to the breeders’ rights and to applications for such rights.

Section 37

Appeal

The final decision of the register authority on the breeders’ rights shall be subject to appeal by the applicant or the holder of the breeders’ rights, if the decision goes against them. A person that had lodged a claim against the application may appeal a decision approving the application despite the proper lodging of the claim against such application. If the person that had entered an appeal withdraws his appeal, the appeal may nonetheless be considered if there are special reasons.

The applicant may appeal a decision by which a request referred to in Section 16 for the transfer of an application has been approved. The person presenting the claim for transfer of an application may appeal a decision rejecting his request.

The decision of the register authority shall be subject to appeal before the Supreme Administrative Court. Appeal shall be filed within 60 days of the date on which service of the decision was made.

Section 38

Forum

The forum for cases dealt with under this Law is the City Court of Helsinki.

Section 39

Fees

The amount of the fees referred to in this Law shall correspond to the total costs for the State of providing the services (cost price). However, the amount of the registration fee and the annual fee may be determined so that the total amount collected from these is estimated to correspond to the total costs incurred by the State in maintaining the register.

Fees of equal size may be required for similar services by the Plant Variety Board even when the costs incurred by the State in providing the services differ. In determining the amount of such a fixed fee, the average total costs of the service shall be taken into consideration.

The fees may be set in general at an amount that is above or below the cost price or the fee calculated in accordance with the second sentence of the first paragraph or may be waived entirely, if this is due to international agreements, reasons of trade policy or practical reasons.

In other respects, the provisions of the State Cost Assessment Act (150/92) shall apply to the fees.

Section 40

Supplementary Provisions

Further provisions on the implementation of this Law shall be issued by Decree. The Plant Variety Board may issue further regulations on the registration of applications and their examination.

Legislative Texts

Section 41

Entry into Force of the Act

This Law shall enter into force on October 15, 1992. However, Section 8, second paragraph, item 1, shall not enter into force until the date stipulated by Decree.

Measures necessary for the implementation of the Law may be taken before this Law enters into force.


Législation Est remplacé(e) par (2 texte(s)) Est remplacé(e) par (2 texte(s)) Référence du document de l'OMC
IP/N/1/FIN/P/3
Aucune donnée disponible

N° WIPO Lex FI024