À propos de la propriété intellectuelle Formation en propriété intellectuelle Respect de la propriété intellectuelle Sensibilisation à la propriété intellectuelle La propriété intellectuelle pour… Propriété intellectuelle et… Propriété intellectuelle et… Information relative aux brevets et à la technologie Information en matière de marques Information en matière de dessins et modèles industriels Information en matière d’indications géographiques Information en matière de protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Lois, traités et jugements dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Ressources relatives à la propriété intellectuelle Rapports sur la propriété intellectuelle Protection des brevets Protection des marques Protection des dessins et modèles industriels Protection des indications géographiques Protection des obtentions végétales (UPOV) Règlement extrajudiciaire des litiges Solutions opérationnelles à l’intention des offices de propriété intellectuelle Paiement de services de propriété intellectuelle Décisions et négociations Coopération en matière de développement Appui à l’innovation Partenariats public-privé Outils et services en matière d’intelligence artificielle L’Organisation Travailler avec nous Responsabilité Brevets Marques Dessins et modèles industriels Indications géographiques Droit d’auteur Secrets d’affaires Académie de l’OMPI Ateliers et séminaires Application des droits de propriété intellectuelle WIPO ALERT Sensibilisation Journée mondiale de la propriété intellectuelle Magazine de l’OMPI Études de cas et exemples de réussite Actualités dans le domaine de la propriété intellectuelle Prix de l’OMPI Entreprises Universités Peuples autochtones Instances judiciaires Ressources génétiques, savoirs traditionnels et expressions culturelles traditionnelles Économie Financement Actifs incorporels Égalité des genres Santé mondiale Changement climatique Politique en matière de concurrence Objectifs de développement durable Technologies de pointe Applications mobiles Sport Tourisme PATENTSCOPE Analyse de brevets Classification internationale des brevets Programme ARDI – Recherche pour l’innovation Programme ASPI – Information spécialisée en matière de brevets Base de données mondiale sur les marques Madrid Monitor Base de données Article 6ter Express Classification de Nice Classification de Vienne Base de données mondiale sur les dessins et modèles Bulletin des dessins et modèles internationaux Base de données Hague Express Classification de Locarno Base de données Lisbon Express Base de données mondiale sur les marques relative aux indications géographiques Base de données PLUTO sur les variétés végétales Base de données GENIE Traités administrés par l’OMPI WIPO Lex – lois, traités et jugements en matière de propriété intellectuelle Normes de l’OMPI Statistiques de propriété intellectuelle WIPO Pearl (Terminologie) Publications de l’OMPI Profils nationaux Centre de connaissances de l’OMPI Série de rapports de l’OMPI consacrés aux tendances technologiques Indice mondial de l’innovation Rapport sur la propriété intellectuelle dans le monde PCT – Le système international des brevets ePCT Budapest – Le système international de dépôt des micro-organismes Madrid – Le système international des marques eMadrid Article 6ter (armoiries, drapeaux, emblèmes nationaux) La Haye – Le système international des dessins et modèles industriels eHague Lisbonne – Le système d’enregistrement international des indications géographiques eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Médiation Arbitrage Procédure d’expertise Litiges relatifs aux noms de domaine Accès centralisé aux résultats de la recherche et de l’examen (WIPO CASE) Service d’accès numérique aux documents de priorité (DAS) WIPO Pay Compte courant auprès de l’OMPI Assemblées de l’OMPI Comités permanents Calendrier des réunions WIPO Webcast Documents officiels de l’OMPI Plan d’action de l’OMPI pour le développement Assistance technique Institutions de formation en matière de propriété intellectuelle Mesures d’appui concernant la COVID-19 Stratégies nationales de propriété intellectuelle Assistance en matière d’élaboration des politiques et de formulation de la législation Pôle de coopération Centres d’appui à la technologie et à l’innovation (CATI) Transfert de technologie Programme d’aide aux inventeurs WIPO GREEN Initiative PAT-INFORMED de l’OMPI Consortium pour des livres accessibles L’OMPI pour les créateurs WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Assistant de classification États membres Observateurs Directeur général Activités par unité administrative Bureaux extérieurs Avis de vacance d’emploi Achats Résultats et budget Rapports financiers Audit et supervision
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Lois Traités Jugements Recherche par ressort juridique

Loi sur la protection des obtentions végétales (Journal officiel du Monténégro, n° 48/2007, 48/2008 et 40/2011), Monténégro

Retour
Version la plus récente dans WIPO Lex
Détails Détails Année de version 2011 Dates Modifié jusqu’à: 16 août 2011 Entrée en vigueur: 17 août 2007 Publié: 9 août 2007 Adopté/e: 24 juillet 2007 Type de texte Principales lois de propriété intellectuelle Sujet Protection des obtentions végétales Sujet (secondaire) Mise en application des droits, Organe de réglementation de la PI, Marques, Noms commerciaux Notes This consolidated version of the "Law on Protection of Plant Varieties Varieties (Official Gazette of Montenegro, No. 48/2007)" takes into account amendments up to the "Law on Amendments to the Law Prescribing Fines for Misdemeanors", which was published in the "Official Gazette of Montenegro, No. 40/2011" on August 8, 2011, and entered into force on August 16, 2011.

Documents disponibles

Texte(s) principal(aux) Textes connexe(s)
Texte(s) princip(al)(aux) Texte(s) princip(al)(aux) Monténégrin Zakon o zaštiti biljnih sorti ("Sl. list CG", br. 48/2007, 48/2008 i 40/2011)       Anglais Law on Protection of Plant Varieties (Official Gazette of Montenegro, No. 48/2007, 48/2008 and 40/2011)        
 Law on Protection of Plant Varieties (Adopted on 11.08.2008)

Official Journal of the Republic of Montenegro No. 48/07, 48/08 and 40/11

LAW ON PROTECTION OF PLANT VARIETIES

I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Subject-matter of the Law

Article 1

This Law shall govern the terms and the procedure for the protection of plant varieties

(hereinafter referred to as: varieties) as well as rights and obligations of holders of the

breeder’s rights.

This Law shall apply to all plant genera and species.

Article 2

For the purposes of this Law, the terms used shall have the following meaning:

1) Variety shall mean a plant grouping within a single botanical taxon of the lowest

known rank, which grouping, irrespective of whether the conditions for the grant of

a breeder’s right are fully met, can be defined by the expression of the

characteristics resulting from a given genotype or combination of genotypes and is

distinguished from any other plant grouping by the expression of at least one of the

said characteristics and considered a unit with regard to its suitability for being

propagated unchanged;

2) Protected variety shall mean a variety protected in accordance with the provisions

of this Law;

3) Breeder shall mean:

- the person who bred or discovered and developed a new variety,

- the person who is the employer of the aforementioned person referred to in indent

1 of this item, or the person who has commissioned the latter’s work; or

- the successor in title of the person referred to in first or second indent of this item,

as the case may be;

4) Breeder’s right shall mean the right of the breeder acknowledged by registration of

the protected variety into the Register of Protected Varieties, in accordance with

this Law;

5) Breeder’s right holder shall mean a person who has been granted a breeder’s right

in accordance with provisions of this Law, or his successor in title or heir;

6) Register of Applications for variety protection shall mean the register into which

duly filed applications for protection of a plant variety are recorded (hereinafter

referred to as: Register of Applications);

7) Register of Protected Varieties shall mean a register into which protected varieties

are recorded;

8) UPOV means the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants.

Rights of Foreign Persons

Article 3

Foreign legal and natural persons shall enjoy the rights identical to those of domestic

persons with respect to variety protection in Montenegro.

Article 4

In the proceedings before the competent authority, any foreign legal and natural person

shall be represented by a local representative.

II. VARIETY PROTECTION

1) CONDITIONS AND DURATION

Conditions

Article 5

A variety shall be protected in accordance with this Law provided that it is new, distinct,

uniform, stable and designated by an appropriate denomination.

Period of protection

Article 6

The period of protection of a variety shall expire after twenty five years, and in the case

of trees and vines it shall expire thirty five years from the day of the grant of the

breeder’s right.

2. NEW VARIETY

Article 7

A variety shall be considered new if, at the date of filing of the application for a variety

protection, the propagating or harvested material of the variety has not been sold or

otherwise disposed of to others, by or with the consent of the breeder, for the purpose of

exploitation of the variety in Montenegro for the period longer than one year or in a

territory other than Montenegro for the period longer than four years or, in the case of

trees and vines, longer than six years from the said date.

The variety referred to in the paragraph 1 of this Article shall also be considered new in

cases when it is disposed of to others in one of the following ways:

1) By a contract on the transfer of the breeder’s right;

2) By a contract on the basis of which the propagating material of the variety is

multiplied on behalf of the holder of the breeder’s right, provided that the

propagating material multiplied is returned to the holder of the breeder’s right

and that the propagating material multiplied is not used for production of another

variety;

3) By a contract on the basis of which researches are made in the experimental field

and in laboratories, for the purpose of variety evaluation.

3. DISTINCTNESS

Article 8

The variety shall be deemed to be distinct if it is clearly distinguishable from any other

variety whose existence is a matter of common knowledge at the time of the filing of the

application.

In particular, the filing of an application for granting of a breeder’s right or for entering

of another variety into an official register of varieties, in any country, shall be deemed to

render that other variety a matter of common knowledge from the date of the

application, provided that the application leads to the granting of a breeder’s right or to

the entering of the said other variety into the official register of varieties, as the case

may be.

The methods for checking the distinctness of a variety shall be laid down by the

Ministry responsible of agriculture (hereinafter referred to as: Ministry).

4. UNIFORMITY

Article 9

The variety shall be deemed to be uniform if, subject to the variation that may be

expected from the particular features of its propagation, it is sufficiently uniform in its

relevant characteristics.

The methods for checking the uniformity of a variety shall be laid down by the Ministry.

5. STABILITY

Article 10

The variety shall be deemed to be stable if its relevant characteristics remain unchanged

after repeated propagation or, in the case of a particular cycle of propagation, at the end

of each such cycle.

The methods for checking the stability of a variety shall be laid down by the Ministry.

6. VARIETY DENOMINATION

Variety

Article 11

The variety denomination may be a word, a combination of words, a combination of

words and numbers or a combination of letters and numbers, meaningful or

meaningless, provided that the designation enables the variety to be identified.

Where a variety denomination has already been used in Montenegro or some other

country or where an application is filed or the denomination already registered in

Montenegro or some other country, only the variety denomination which has been

proposed may be used in the protection procedure before the competent authority.

Where a variety denomination proposed is inappropriate for use in Montenegro, the

breeder shall propose another denomination which, if it is appropriate, shall be

registered in the Register of Applications and the Register of Protected Varieties.

A variety denomination may not consist solely of figures unless this is an established

practice for designating specific varieties. A variety denomination may not mislead or

cause confusion concerning the characteristics, value or identity of the variety or the

identity of the breeder. A variety denomination shall be different from any other

denomination used on the territory of UPOV Members for designation of existing

variety of the same plant species or a closely related species.

Any person who markets or advertises the propagating material of a variety protected

shall use the registered variety denomination.

The obligation concerning the use of the registered variety denomination shall not

expire even after the expiration of the period of variety protection referred to under the

Article 6 of this Law, except where, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 8 of

this Article, prior rights prevent such use.

When a variety is marketed or advertised, a trademark, trade name or other similar

indication may be associated with the registered variety denomination, provided that the

variety denomination is easily distinguishable.

Where use of a variety denomination is forbidden to a person who is bound to use it, for

reasons of any of the prior rights of a third person, the competent authority in

responsible for plant variety protection (hereinafter referred to as: competent authority)

shall request from the breeder to propose another denomination for the variety.

Denomination Proposal

Article 12

The applicant shall propose a variety denomination in the application.

The applicant may temporarily postpone the proposal of a denomination, but not longer

than 30 days from the day of filing the application. If the applicant fails to submit the

proposal in due time, the competent authority shall reject the application.

An interested person may, within the period of 60 days from the date of publication of

the proposed denomination, file an objection to the proposed denomination.

The competent authority shall notify the applicant of the objection referred to in

paragraph 3 of this Article and invite him to submit a reply to the objection within the

period of 30 days from the day of the receipt of the notification.

In his reply to the objection, the applicant may propose a new denomination for the

variety.

In case the denomination proposed does not comply with this Law, the competent

authority shall order the applicant to file a proposal for a new denomination of the

variety within the period of 60 days from the day of the receipt of the notification.

If the applicant fails to submit the proposal of the new denomination within the

prescribed period of time, the competent authority shall reject the application.

The variety denomination is granted by the competent authority in the decision on

variety protection.

Reasons for Rejection of Denomination Proposed

Article 13

The competent authority shall reject the proposal of a variety denomination, which:

1) Is inappropriate for a variety identification;

2) Consists solely of signs or indications that may serve for indication of a variety,

kind, quality, quantity, intended objective, value geographic origin or time of

production;

3) Is contrary to Article 11 of this Law;

The Ministry shall prescribe which species are to be deemed closely related.

Denomination Cancellation

Article 14

The competent authority shall cancel a variety denomination under the circumstances

referred to in Article 13 paragraph 1 of this Law, or on the basis of a court decision

prohibiting the use of the denomination.

The competent authority shall issue a notification on cancellation of the variety

denomination and invite the holder of the breeder’s right to propose a new denomination

within the period of 30 days from the day of receipt of the notification.

III VARIETY PROTECTION PROCEDURE

1. APPLICATION

Article 15

The procedure for protection of a variety instigated by the filing of an application filed

to the competent authority by the breeder or his representative.

The form and contents of the application referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall

be prescribed by the Ministry.

Additional Information

Article 16

The application referred to in Article 15, paragraph 1 of this Law shall be supplemented

by the information, documents and material necessary for examination purposes.

The method of submission of the information documents and material referred to in

paragraph 1 of this Article shall be prescribed by the Ministry.

Examination of the Application

Article 17

The competent authority shall examine whether the application is complete, i.e. whether

it meets the requirements as laid down by this law.

If the application is found not to be complete, the competent authority shall, stating the

reasons, invite the applicant to correct the deficiencies identified within the period of 30

days from the day of receipt of the notification.

If the applicant does not correct deficiencies within the period referred to in paragraph 2

of this Article, the competent authority shall reject the application.

Entry into the Register of Applications

Article 18

Where it is established that the application meets the requirements, the competent

authority shall register it into the Register of Applications.

The contents of the Register of Applications shall be prescribed by the Ministry.

The Register of Applications shall be kept by the competent authority.

2. RIGHT OF PRIORITY

Article 19

Any breeder who has duly filed an application for the protection of a variety with the

competent authority of another UPOV member for the grant of a breeder’s right shall

enjoy a right of priority for a period of twelve months from the day of filing the

application.

If two or more breeders have independently bred or discovered and developed a new

variety, the right of priority shall be enjoyed by the breeder who was the first to file an

application for the variety protection to the competent authority.

In order to avail himself of the right of priority, the breeder shall furnish the competent

authority with the evidence on the priority date within a period of three months.

If the competent authority accepts the evidence on the priority date, the application shall

be deemed as filed on the priority day.

The breeder shall be allowed a period of two years after the expiration of the period of

priority or, where the first application is rejected or withdrawn, an appropriate time after

such rejection or withdrawal, in which to furnish, to the competent authority, any

necessary information, document or material required for the purpose of the

examination of the application.

The appropriate time referred to in paragraph 5 of this Article shall be prescribed by the

Ministry shall.

3. VARIETY EXAMINATION

Examination

Article 20

Any decision to grant a breeder’s right shall require an examination for compliance with

the conditions under this Law. In the course of the examination, the competent authority

may grow the variety or carry out other necessary tests, cause the growing of the variety

or the carrying out of other necessary tests, or take into account the results of growing

tests or other trials, which have already been carried out. For the purposes of

examination, the competent authority may require the breeder to furnish all the

necessary information, documents or material.

Examiner

Article 21

Examination of a variety may be carried out by a natural or legal person that meets the

requirements for carrying out such examination in terms of human resources, facilities

and equipment (hereinafter referred to as: examiner).

Requirements that need to be met by the examiner shall be prescribed by the Ministry.

Compliance with requirements referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall be

prescribed by the competent authority.

Processing of Examination Results

Article 22

The competent authority shall conclude the contract with the examiner on the basis of

public announcement procedure.

The competent authority shall process the examination results obtained from the

examiner.

The Ministry shall prescribe the methods for processing of the results referred to in

paragraph 2 of this Article.

4. DECISION ON VARIETY PROTECTION AND GRANT OF BREEDER’S RIGHT

Article 23

Based on examination results, the competent authority shall issue a decision on

protection of the variety or refusal of the application for the protection of the variety, as

the case may be.

Based on the decision on protection of the variety, the variety shall be registered into the

Register of Protected Varieties.

The applicant shall have the right to lodge an appeal to the Ministry against the decision

on refusal of the variety protection.

In the appeal procedure, the examination of the variety in the examination field and the

laboratory for the purpose of the supervision shall be conferred to another examiner.

When the supervision results confirm that the variety meets the requirements for

protection and entry into the Register of Protected Varieties, the supervision costs shall

be borne by the examiner who initially presented the examination results.

When the supervision results confirm the initial examination results, the supervision

costs shall be borne by the applicant who has lodged the appeal.

The contents of the Register of Protected Varieties shall be prescribed by the Ministry.

The Register of Protected Varieties shall be kept by the competent authority.

The information on the variety protection, including the variety denomination and

information on the breeder, the holder of the right and their domicile or corporate

domicile, as the case may be, shall be published in the ''Official Journal of Montenegro

of Montenegro'', within the period of 30 days from the day of entry in the Register of

Protected Varieties.

Availability of Information and Confidentiality

Article 24

Any interested person may peruse the following:

1) the Register of Applications for Variety Protection;

2) the results of variety examination in the protection procedure;

3) the Register of Protected Varieties.

When a variety production requires repeated use of another variety (component), the

applicant may request in his application that the documents and results of component

examination be treated as confidential.

5. APPEAL

Right to Appeal

Article 25

Any interested person who alleges that the applicant is not entitled to the breeder’s right

or that he does not have the right of priority or that conditions for protection of a variety

under this Law have not been complied with, may lodge an appeal to the Ministry with

respect to the entry of the application into the Register of Application or to the entry of

the variety into the Register of Protected Varieties within the period of 60 days from the

day of publicizing the information on the entry.

The appeal shall be lodged in writing, accompanied with the appropriate evidence.

The appeal referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be forwarded to the applicant

or holder of the right, together with an invitation to provide a reply to the appeal within

the period of 15 days from the date of the receipt of the complaint.

Decision on the Appeal to the Entry into the Register of Applications

Article 26

If the applicant fails to present a reply to the appeal within the period prescribed, the

application shall be deemed withdrawn.

If the applicant presents a reply to the appeal and demands the decision on his

application, with or without amendments, the decision on the application and the appeal

shall be made concurrently.

Appeal to Registration in the Register of Protected Varieties

Article 27

The appeal to registration in the Register of Protected Varieties may be submitted by a

person who alleges that the variety is not new, distinct, uniform or stable.

The appeal referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be lodged to the Ministry.

Additional examination of the variety may be ordered in the appeal procedure in order

to verify the statements of the appeal.

At the request of the body that decides the appeal, the person who has lodged the appeal

shall present, within the period of 15 days, the additional information and documents to

substantiate the appeal or reproduction material necessary for the examination.

When the person who lodged the appeal fails to act in compliance with paragraph 3 of

this Article, the appeal shall be rejected.

Based on the findings in the proceedings initiated upon the appeal, the appeal may be

either accepted, thus canceling the entry into the Register of Protected Varieties, or

dismissed.

IV. THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE BREEDER

1. RIGHTS

Scope of the Breeder’s Right

Article 28

The holder of the breeder’s rights shall be entitled to indication of his name and the

denomination in acts, registers, documents and publications.

The propagating material of a protected variety shall be used only with authorization of

the holder of the breeder’s right, who sets the conditions for granting the authorization.

Subject to Articles 29 and 30 of this Law, the following acts in respect of the

propagating material of a protected variety shall require the authorization of the breeder:

1) Production or reproduction (multiplication) of the variety protected;

2) Conditioning for the purpose of propagation of the protected variety;

3) Offering the protected variety for sale;

4) Selling or other marketing of the protected variety;

5) Exporting or importing of the protected variety;

6) Stocking for any of the purposes referred to in items 1 to 5 of the paragraph 3 of

this Article.

Subject to Articles 29 and 30 of this Law, acts referred to in the paragraph 3 items 1 to 6

of this Article, in respect of the harvested material, including whole plants and parts of

plants obtained through the unauthorized use of the propagating material of the

protected variety shall require the authorization of the holder of the breeder’s right,

unless the holder has had reasonable opportunity to exercise his right in relation to the

propagating material concerned.

The authorization of the holder of the breeder’s right shall also be required for the acts

referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4 of this Article for a variety:

1) Which is essentially derived from the protected variety where the protected

variety is not in itself an essentially derived variety;

2) Which is not clearly distinguishable from the protected variety; and

3) Whose production requires the repeated use of the protected variety.

A variety shall be deemed to be essentially derived from the initial variety when:

1) It is predominantly derived from the initial variety, or from a variety that is itself

predominantly derived from the initial variety, while retaining the expression of

the essential characteristics resulting from the genotype or combination of

genotypes of the initial variety;

2) It is clearly distinguishable from the initial variety; and

3) With the exception of the differences resulting from the act of derivation, it

conforms to the initial variety in the expression of the essential characteristics

that result from the genotype or a combination of genotypes of the initial variety.

For the purpose of paragraph 5, subparagraph 1 and paragraph 6 of this Article, an

essentially derived variety may be obtained, for example, by selection of a natural or

induced mutant, or of a somaclonal variant, the selection of a variant individual from

plants of the initial variety, backcrossing or transformation by genetic engineering.

Exceptions to the Breeder’s Right

Article 29

Authorization of the holder of the breeder’s right shall not be required for the acts

undertaken for:

 Personal use and for non-commercial purposes;

 Experimental purposes;

 For the purpose of breeding other varieties, and, except where the provisions of

Article 28 paragraph 5 apply, acts referred to in Article 28 paragraphs 3 and 4 of

this Law, in respect of such other varieties.

The Ministry may, taking into account the need for safeguarding the breeder’s rights,

restrict within reasonable limits the breeder’s right, subject to remuneration that shall not

be lower than the market one, in relation to selected agricultural crops to allow farmers to

use for propagation purposes, on their own holdings, the harvested material obtained by

planting the protected variety on their own holdings.

The Ministry shall prescribe the list of agricultural crops referred to in paragraph 2 of this

Article.

The exception referred to in paragraph 1 and 2 of this Article shall not apply to fruits,

ornamentals and vegetables.

Exhaustion of the Breeder’s Right

Article 30

The breeder’s right shall not extend to acts concerning any material of the protected

variety, or of a variety covered by the provisions of Article 28, paragraph 5 of this Law,

which has been sold or otherwise marketed by the breeder or with his consent in the

territory of Montenegro, or any material derived from the said material, unless such

acts:

1) Involve further propagation of the variety in question, or

2) Involve an export of material of the variety, which enables the propagation of the

variety, into a country which does not protect varieties of the plant genus or

species to which the variety belongs, except where the exported material is for

final consumption purposes.

For the purposes of paragraph 1 of this Article, “material” shall mean, in relation to a

variety:

1) Propagating material of any kind,

2) Harvested material, including entire plants and parts of plants, and

3) Any product made directly from the harvested material.

Provisional Protection

Article 31

During the period between publication of the application for the grant of the variety

protection and the granting of the right on the variety protection, the holder of the

breeder’s right shall be entitled to equitable compensation from any person who, during

the period concerned, has carried out acts which, once the right is granted, require the

authorization of the holder of the breeder’s right, as provided in Article 28 of this Law.

Several Breeders, Breeder and Employer

Article 32

If two or more persons have jointly bred or discovered and developed a variety, they

shall have equal rights to protection. The rights and obligations of such persons may be

regulated by a contract.

When a variety is bred or discovered and developed during the employment, the rights

of the employee who bred, discovered or developed the variety concerned and the rights

of the employer shall be laid down by this Law, general legal acts and a contract

between the employer and the employee or their representatives, as the case may be.

2. OBLIGATIONS

Maintenance of the Protected Variety

Article 33

The holder of the breeder’s right shall ensure maintenance of the protected variety

unchanged during the period of protection.

Monitoring of Variety Maintenance

Article 34

The competent authority shall issue a decision on cancellation of the breeder’s right if it

is established that the holder of the breeder’s right has failed to maintain the variety.

Providing Samples of the Variety

Article 35

At the request of the competent authority, the holder of a breeder’s right shall provide an

appropriate quantity of samples of the propagating material of the protected variety

deemed necessary for verifying the maintenance of the variety.

At the request of the competent authority, the holder of the breeder’s right shall

maintain or keep the sample of the variety.

V LICENSES

Transfer and Licensing of Breeder’s Right

Article 36

A holder of the breeder’s right may transfer his right to a protected variety as a whole,

or license some of his rights to another person.

The transfer of right and granting the license shall be made by a written contract, which

shall include provisions on the following: the scope of right, the period of time for

which the right is transferred and the fee for use of the right, if any.

For the purpose of entry into the Register of Protected Varieties, the holder of the

breeder’s right shall inform the competent authority of any transfer or license of rights.

The information shall include the particulars of the transferee or the licensee, scope of

right, and the period of time for which the right is transferred or licensed.

Compulsory License

Article 37

When the holder of the breeder’s right refuses to transfer his right of economic use of

the variety protected to other persons, or when he sets unjustified conditions for such

transfer, the competent authority may grant the compulsory license, provided that the

use is of public interest for development of plant production, for protection and

development of the environment or for a specific economic branch.

Prior to filing the request referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, the interested person

shall have to provide evidence on his attempt to obtain the authorization from the holder

of the breeder’s right for the acts referred to in Article 28 of this Law under reasonable

economic conditions, and the evidence that the authorization was not granted to him

within the reasonable period of time.

The compulsory license referred in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be granted only to

the interested person who proves its capability and capacity required for the economic

use of the protected plant variety.

Time Limit for Requesting the Compulsory license

Article 38

The request for grant of the compulsory license may not be filed earlier than four years

from the date of filling the application, or three years from the date of grant of the

breeder’s right, whichever expires later.

The compulsory license shall not be granted if the holder of the breeder’s right proves

that there are reasons justifying his refusal to grant the authorization for use of the

protected variety or conditions for such a use.

Compulsory License Fee

Article 39

The holder of the compulsory license shall pay the holder of the breeder’s right the fee

mutual agreed. In the absence of the agreement on the amount and method of paying the

fee, the amount of the fee shall be set by the competent court, taking into account the

circumstances of each individual case and the economic value of the compulsory

license.

Scope and Duration of the Compulsory License

Article 40

The scope and the duration of the compulsory license shall be limited to the purpose it

was granted for.

The compulsory license shall not be exclusive.

The compulsory license may be transferred only together with the company or part of

the company in which it is used, as the case may be.

The compulsory license shall be granted primarily for the purposes of supplying the

domestic market.

The compulsory license may be cancelled if and when the circumstances that have led to

its grant cease to exist and if it is unlikely that they will reoccur. Upon the substantiated

request, the competent authority shall review the existence of such circumstances.

The compulsory license may also be cancelled when the competent authority establishes

that the person to whom it was granted fails to meet the conditions under which it was

granted.

Obligation to Supply Propagating Material

Article 41

The holder of the breeder’s right shall, at the request of the competent authority and

subject to payment of the appropriate remuneration, supply the propagating material

necessary for utilization of the compulsory license to the person to whom the

compulsory license has been granted.

VI. TERMINATION OF BREEDER’S RIGHT

Reasons for Termination of Breeder’s Right

Article 42

The breeder’s right shall terminate before the term referred to under the Article 6 of this

Law if:

1) The right holder informs the competent authority in writing form that he wants

to terminate the breeder’s right, effective as of the date stated or as of the filing

date;

2) The holder of the breeder’s right dies or ceases to exist without a heir or

successor in rights, on the date of death or cessation;

The decision on termination of the breeder’s right shall be made by the competent

authority which shall enter it into the Register of Protected Varieties.

Nullity

Article 43

The competent authority may declare null and void the decision on protection of the

variety throughout the period of protection, ex officio or at the proposal of an interested

person if:

1) It is established that the variety was neither new nor distinct at the time of the

grant of the breeder’s right;

2) It is established that the decision on granting the breeder’s right has been

essentially based upon information and documents furnished by the applicant,

while conditions of stability and uniformity were not complied with at the time

of the grant of the breeder’s right;

3) The breeder’s right has been granted to a person who is not entitled to it,

except in the case where, in the meantime, it has been transferred to the person

who is so entitled.

The decision referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be entered into the Register

of Protected Varieties.

After the decision referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article becomes final and

enforceable, the competent authority shall delete the variety from the Register of the

Protected Varieties.

An appeal against the decision referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article may be lodged

to the Ministry.

Cancellation of the Decision

Article 44

The competent authority shall cancel the decision on protection of the variety if:

1) It is established that the variety is no longer uniform or stable;

2) The holder of the breeder’s right fails to furnish the competent authority with

information, documents or material deemed necessary for verification of the

variety maintenance;

3) The holder of the breeder’s right fails to propose another denomination for the

variety if the variety denomination has been cancelled after the grant of the right;

4) The breeder fails to pay the fee for maintenance of the breeder’s right;

5) The annual costs of variety protection have not been paid on the due date.

The decision referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be entered into the Register

of Protected Varieties.

After the decision referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article becomes final and

enforceable, the competent authority shall delete the variety from the Register of the

Protected Varieties.

VII. COSTS

Article 45

The costs of variety examination in the examination field and the laboratory and annual

costs of variety protection shall be borne by the applicant or the holder of the breeder’s

right, as the case may be.

The amount of the costs referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be prescribed by

the Ministry.

VIII. CIVIL LAW PROTECTION

Article 46

The holder of the breeder’s right or his successor in rights or heir, as the case may be,

shall be entitled to file a civil action against the person infringing his right through

actions referred to under the Article 28 paragraph 2, 3 and 4 of this Law without

authorization, and shall have the right to claim the following:

1) Ascertaining of infringement of the breeder’s right;

2) Prohibition of actions infringing the breeder’s right;

3) compensation for damages caused by infringement, including direct damages,

lost profits and justifiable legal costs and expenses;

4) Publicizing of the court decision at the expense of the defendant;

5) Forfeiture or destruction, without compensation of any sort, of the items and

equipment predominantly used for infringement of the breeder’s right;

6) Forfeiture or destruction, without compensation of any sort, of infringing

products.

General regulations on compensation of damages shall be applied to issues related to

compensation of the damage done by infringement of the breeder’s right that have not

been provided for by this law.

If a violation of rights has been committed intentionally or out of gross negligence, the

plaintiff may, instead of the amount of compensation referred to paragraph 1, item 3 of

this Article, claim an amount equal to the threefold amount of remuneration that would

have been paid had the use of the right been lawful.

Statute of Limitations

Article 47

The action referred to in Article 46, paragraph 1 of this Law may be filed within a

period of three years from the date of obtaining information of the infringement and the

offender, but not later than five years from the date on which the infringement has been

committed.

Proceedings for the violation of breeder’s right shall be administered in an expedited

manner.

Provisional Measures

Article 48

At the request of a right holder who makes it credible that his right has been infringed,

or that such infringement is imminent, the court may order a provisional measure

involving the seizure or removal from the market of the object with which the

infringement has been made and/or a provisional measure involving a prohibition

against the acts under way, which could be conducive to violation.

Securing of Evidence

Article 49

At the request of the right holder who makes it credible that his/her right has been

violated, or that such violation is imminent or that irreparable harm is likely to occur, or

that there is a reasonable doubt that the evidence of that will be destroyed or that it will

not be possible to obtain it later on, the court may order a measure to secure evidence

without giving prior notice to or hearing the person from which evidence is to be

collected.

For the purposes of Paragraph 1 of this Article, the securing of evidence shall mean the

inspection of premises, books, documents, databases, etc., as well as the seizure of

documents and infringing goods, depositions of witnesses and expert witnesses.

The court decision ordering measures to secure evidence shall be served to the person

from which evidence is to be collected, on the occasion of the collection of evidence,

and to an absent person, as soon as that becomes possible.

Request for Provisional Measures

Article 50

Measures referred to in Articles 48 and 49 of this Law may be requested even before

filing an action.

In the case referred to in Paragraph 1 of this Article, decision establishing the measure

shall contain the period in which the action has to be filed, which shall not be shorter

than 30 days from the execution of the measure.

An appeal lodged against a decision ordering a provisional measure shall not stay the

execution of the decision.

Obligation of the Defendant to Furnish the Information

Article 51

The court may order the defendant to furnish information about third parties related to

the violation or hand over documents relating to the violation.

The person failing to meet the obligation referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article liable

shall be liable for any damages thus incurred.

IX. INSPECTORIAL SUPERVISION

Article 52

For the purpose of protection of breeder’s rights granted under this Law, inspectorial

supervision over the enforcement of this Law shall be performed by the competent

authority through a phytosanitary inspector, in compliance with the law.

Any provisions of other laws or regulations that regulate the production, certification

and marketing of material of varieties or the importing or exporting of such material,

shall not affect the application of the provisions of this Law.

1. POWERS OF A PHYTOSANITARY INSPECTOR

Article 53

A phytosanitary inspector shall perform inspectorial supervision particularly in regard

to:

1) Examination of distinctness, stability or uniformity of varieties in the

experimental field or laboratory of the examiner;

2) Examiner’s compliance with the conditions for examination of varieties in the

experimental field or laboratory;

3) Unauthorized acts in relation to the protected variety referred to in Article 28 of

this Law;

4) Use of the protected variety denomination;

5) Sampling of propagating material, free of charge, for the purpose of establishing

the compliance with the conditions prescribed by this Law.

2. ADMINISTRATIVE MEASURES AND ACTIONS

Article 54

In cases where a breach of law or other regulation has been established, a phytosanitary

inspector shall, in addition to administrative measures and actions laid down by the law

governing the inspectorial supervision, undertake the following administrative measures

and actions:

1) Prohibit placing on the market, import or export of propagating material of

varieties if it is established that the propagating material fails to meet the

conditions prescribed by this Law, or that the right of the holder of the breeder

right has been infringed;

2) Prohibit the examiner the examination of varieties in the experimental field or in

the laboratory if he fails to remove the deficiencies in regard of conditions laid

down by this Law.

X. PENAL PROVISIONS

Article 55

A legal person shall be fined by a fine amounting to between EUR 700 and EUR

25,000, if it:

1) Uses the variety denomination not granted by the decision of the competent

authority (Article 12 paragraph 8);

2) Without authorization by the holder of the breeder’s right, produces or

reproduces, conditions for the purpose of propagation of the protected variety,

offers for sale, sells or markets in any other way, exports or imports, or stocks

for any of the said purposes the protected variety (Article 28, paragraph 3).

For a violation under the first paragraph of this Article, a natural person and the

responsible person of the legal entity shall be fined by a fine amounting to between

EUR 100 and EUR 3,000.

For infringement under the first paragraph of this Article, an entrepreneur shall be fined

by a fine amounting to between EUR 300 and EUR 8,000.

For the offence referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, in addition to the fine, a

measure of prohibition of activity ranging from one to six months, may be imposed on

the company, other legal person or entrepreneur.

Article 56

A legal person shall be fined by a fine amounting to between EUR 500 and EUR

20,000, if it at the request of the competent authority fails to supply to the person to

whom the compulsory licence was granted the appropriate quantity of propagating

material necessary for use of the compulsory licence (Article 41).

For a violation under the first paragraph of this Article, a natural person and the

responsible person of the legal entity shall be fined by a fine amounting to between

EUR 50 and EUR 2,000.

For infringement under the first paragraph of this Article, an entrepreneur shall be fined

by a fine amounting to between EUR 200 and EUR 6,000.

XI. TRANSITIONAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS

Protection of Known Varieties

Article 57

Notwithstanding Article 7 of this Law, the competent authority may grant the breeder’s

right for the variety that is not new on the day this Law enters into force when:

1) The application has been filed no later than 12 months from the day this Law

entered into force; and

2) The variety is:

- Registered in the appropriate variety register recognized by the competent authority;

- The subject of the breeder’s right in a UPOV member state, or the subject of the application in a UPOV member state, where the application leads to grant

of the breeder’s right; or

- The subject of the evidence on the date when the variety ceased to be new in accordance with Article 7 of this Law, which the competent authority finds

acceptable.

Duration of the breeder’s right granted under paragraph 1 of this Article shall starts from

the date of:

- Registration referred to under the paragraph 1, item 2, indent 1 of this Article;

- Grant of the breeder’s right referred to under the paragraph 1, item 2, indent 2 of this Article; or

- When the variety ceased to be new in accordance with paragraph 1, item 2, indent 3 of this Article.

When relevant to the decision of the competent authority, the earliest of the dates

referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall apply.

When the breeder’s right is granted under paragraph 1 of this Article, the holder of the

right shall grant a license under reasonable terms in order to provide for the use of the

variety that the third party began in good faith prior to filing of the application for the

grant of the right under paragraph 1 of this Article.

Article 57a

Provisions of the Law on Enforcement of the Legislation that Regulates Protection of

Intellectual Property Rights ("Official Gazette of the Republic of Montenegro", No.

45/2005) and the Regulation on Actions of the Customs Authority Applicable To Goods

Suspected Of Infringement Of Intellectual Property Rights ("Official Gazette of the

Republic of Montenegro", No. 25/2005) shall apply mutatis mutandis to breeders’ rights

established by this Law.

Article 58

Bylaws for implementation of this Law shall be adopted within the period of one year

from the day this Law enters into force.

Pending the adoption of the regulations based on this Law the regulations adopted under

the Law on Protection of Varieties of Agricultural and Forest Plants (Official Journal of

FRY, No. 12/98, 28/ 2000, 37/02) provided that they not in the contravention of this

Law.

Article 59

On the day this Law enters into force, the Law on Protection of Varieties of Agricultural

and Forest Plants (Official Journal of FRY, No. 12/98, 28/ 2000, 37/02) shall cease to be

effective.

Entering into force

Article 60

This Law shall enter into force on the eighth day after its publishing in the Official

Journal of the Republic of Montenegro.



Traités Se rapporte à (1 document) Se rapporte à (1 document)
Aucune donnée disponible

N° WIPO Lex ME045